Acerca de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la demostración en matemáticas

Referencias

Antonini, S., Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Indirect proof: what is specific to this way of proving? ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 401-412. Arzarello, F., Micheletti, C., Olivero, F., Robutti, O. (1998). A model for analiysing the transition to formal proofs in geometry. Proceedings of the 22th PME International Conference, 2, 24-31. Balacheff, N. (1988a). Une étude des processus de preuve en mathématique chez des élèves de collège (tesis doctoral). Grenoble (Francia). [Traducción al español: Balacheff, N. (2000). Procesos de prueba en los alumnos de matemáticas. Bogotá, Colombia: una empresa docente]. Balacheff, N. (1988b). Aspects of proof in pupils´ practice of school mathematics. En D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216-235). Londres: Hodder & Stoughton. Balacheff, N. (1995). Conception, connaissance et concept. En D. Grenier (Ed.), Didactique et technologies cognitives en mathématiques, séminaires 1994-1995 (pp. 219-244). Grenoble (Francia): Université Joseph Fourier. Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher’s epistemology in mathematics education: an essay on the case of proof. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 501-512. Balacheff, N., Margolinas, C. (2005). cK¢ modèle de connaissances pour le calcul de situations didactiques. En A. Mercier, C. Margolinas (Eds.), Balises pour la didactique des mathématiques (pp. 75-106). Francia: La Pensée Sauvage. Bartolini Bussi, M., Boero, P., Ferri, F., Garuti, R., Mariotti, M. A. (2007a). Approaching and developing the culture of geometry theorems in school: A theoretical framework. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 211-217). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Bartolini Bussi, M., Boni, N., Ferri, F. (2007b). Construction problems in primary school: A case from the geometry of circle. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 219-247). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Battista, M. T., Clements, D. H. (1995). Geometry and proof. The Mathematics Teacher, 88 (1), 48- 54. Bell, A. W. (1976). A study of pupil's proof-explanation in mathematical situation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(1), 23-40. Boero, P. (2007). Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice. Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., Mariotti, A. (1996). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: A hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems. Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference, 2, 113-120. Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E. (2007). Approaching theorems in grade VIII: Some mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures, and conditions suitable to enhance them. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 249-264). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Camargo, L. (2010). Descripción y análisis de un caso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la demostración en una comunidad de práctica de futuros profesores de matemáticas de educación secundaria (tesis doctoral). Valencia (España): Universidad de Valencia. De Villiers, M. (1993). El papel y la función de la demostración en matemáticas. Epsilon 26, 15-29. Douek, N. (1998). Some remarks about argumentation and mathematical proof and their educational implications. Proceeding of the 1st Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME1), 125-139. Duval, R. (1989). Langage et représentation dans l'apprentissage d'une démarche déductive. Proceedings of the 13th PME International Conference, 1, 228-235. Duval, R. (1992-1993). Argumenter, demontrer, expliquer: continuité ou rupture cognitive? Petit x, 31, 37-61. Fiallo, J. (2006). Enseñanza de las razones trigonométricas en un ambiente cabri para el desarrollo de las habilidades de la demostración. (Memoria de investigación). Valencia (España): Universidad de Valencia. Fiallo, J. (2010). Estudio del proceso de demostración en el aprendizaje de las razones trigonométricas en un ambiente de geometría dinámica (tesis doctoral). Valencia (España): Universidad de Valencia. Fiallo, J., Gutiérrez, Á. (2007). Tipos de demostración de estudiantes del grado 10º en Santander (Colombia). En M. Camacho, P. Flores, P. Bolea (Eds.), Investigación en Educación. Godino, J., Recio, A. (2001). Significados institucionales de la demostración. Implicaciones para la educación matemática. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 19(3), 405-414. Groman, M. (1996). Integrating Geometer’s Sketchpad into geometry course for secondary education mathematics major. Proceedings of ASCUE, North Myrtle Beach, EE.UU, 9-13. Gutiérrez, Á., Fiallo, J. (2007). Analysis of conjectures and proofs produced when learning trigonometry. Proceeding of the 5th Conference of European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 622-632. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6-13. Hanna, G., Jahnke, N. (1996). Proof and proving. En A. Bishop y otros (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-908). Dordrecht, Los Países Bajos: Kluwer. Harel, G., Sowder, L. (1998). Student's proof schemes: results from exploratory studies. En A. Schoenfeld y otros (Ed.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, III (pp. 234-283). Providence, EE.UU.: American Mahematical Society. Harel, G., Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. En F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805-842): Reston, VA, EE.UU.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Healy, L., Hoyles, C. (1998). Student’s performance in proving: competence or curriculum? Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME1), 153-167. Healy, L., Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396-428. Healy, L., Hoyles, C. (2001). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 235-256. Hoyles, C. (1997). The curricular shaping of students' approaches. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 7-16. Hoyles, C., Küchemann, D. (2002). Student's understandings of logical implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 193-223. Ibañes, M., Ortega, T. (2003). Reconocimiento de procesos matemáticos en alumnos de primer curso de bachillerato. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21(1), 49-63. Ibañes, M., Ortega, T. (2004). Un análisis del tratamiento de la demostración matemática en los libros de texto de bachillerato. Números, 57, 19-32. Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students’ interpretation when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 55-85. Küchemann, D., Hoyles, C. (2001) Investigating factors that influence students' mathematical reasoning. Proceedings of the 25th PME International Conference, 3, 257-264. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27 (1), 29-63. Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. En Á. Gutiérrez, P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 173-204). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Mariotti, M. A., Bartolini, M., Boero, P., Ferri, F., Garuti, R. (1997) Approaching geometry theorems in contexts: from history and epistemology to cognition, Proceedings of the 21th PME International Conference, 1, 180-195. Marrades, R., Gutiérrez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 87-125. Martin, T. S., Soucy McCrone, S. M., Wallace, M. L., Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 95-124. Parenti, L., Barberis, M., Pastorino, M., Viglienzone, P. (2007). From dynamic exploration to "theory" and "theorems" (from 6th to 8th grades). En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 265-284). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Pedemonte, B. (2002). Etude didactique et cognitive des rapports de l'argumentation et de la démonstration dans le apprentisage des mathématiques (tesis doctoral). Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble I, Grenoble, Francia. Disponible en. Pedemonte, B. (2005). Quelques outils pour l`analyse cognitive du rapport entre argumentation et démonstration. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 25(3), 313-348. Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 23-41. Pedemonte, B. (2008). Argumentation and algebraic proof. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 385-400. Radford, L. (1994). La enseñanza de la demostración: aspectos teóricos y prácticos. Educación Matemática, 6(3), 21-36. Stacey, K., Vincent, J. (2008). Modes of reasoning in explanations in year 8 textbooks. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 475-481. Stylianides, A. J. (2011). Toward a comprehensive knowledge package for teaching proof: A focus on the misconception that empirical arguments are proofs. Pythagoras, 32 (1), 10 páginas. Szendrei-Radnai, J., Török, J. (2007). The tradition and role of proof in mathematics education in Hungary. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 117-134). Rotterdam, Los Países Bajos: Sense. Tall, D. (1998). The cognitive development of proof: is mathematical proof for all or for some. Paper presented at the UCSMP Conference. Chicago University, Chicago, EE.UU. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge, Gran Bretaña: Cambridge University Press.