Posibles perspectivas para profundizar en el campo de la resolución de problemas

Referencias

Bero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Mathematical Proof. 7/8 Bergström, M. (1991): Luovuus ja aivotoiminta (Creativity and brain function).—In: R. Haavikko; Eds., Luovuuden ulottuyuudet (Dimensions of creativity). pp. 159-172. relationship Learning of J.-E. Ruth/ Hanna, G.; Jahnke, H. N. (1996): Proof and proving.—In: Bishop, A. J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Laborde, C. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education. Vol. 4, Pt. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 877–908. Hanna, G., & Villiers, M., (2012). International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Vol 15 (proof and Proving in mathematics educations).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Heinze, A. & Reiss, K. (2004). The teaching of proof at the lower secondary level—a video study. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik , 36, 98-104. Huicahue, J., y Mena-Lorca, J (2015) Modelacion matemática en la formación inicial de profesores, Actas XIX Jornadas Nacionales de Educación Matemática, Villarrica, Chile, 2015, pp. 184-191 English, L., and Lesh, R., and Fennewald, T. (2008). Future directions and perspectives for problem solving research and curriculum development. Paper presented for TSG 19 at the International Congress on Mathematics Education, Monmterrey, Mexico, July 6-13. Erkii P, H. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29: pp 63-67. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económica. (2014), PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014), PISA. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264201118-en. Ministerio de Educación (2012). Curriculum en línea. Visitado el 12 de Enero de 2015, http://www.curriculumenlineamineduc.cl/605/w3-propertyvalue-49395.html Nacional Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1980). An agenda for action: Directions for school mathematics for the 1980s. Reston, VA. Nilsson, P. (2012). Four Ways to Measure Creativity. Sense and Sensation Writing on Education, Creativity, and Cognitive Science. http://www.senseandsensation.com/2012/03/assessing-creativity.html Oldenburg, K. R, and Freinburg, A. R. (2002) Learning to prove: the idea of heuristic examples, Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 34, 29-35. Polya, G.(1945). How to solve it? USA: Princeton. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985) . Orlando, FL: Acedemic Press. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1993). Learning to think Mathematically. In D. G. Grouws, (ed.) Handbook of reserach in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370) New York, NY: Macmillan. Voskoglou, M. Gr. (2011) Problem-solving from Polya to nowadays: A review and future perspectives, In Nata, R. V. (Ed.): Progress in Education, Vol.22, Nova Publishers, NY, Chapter 4, pp.65-82.