Resumen

This article is an effort to understand and analyze the discourse of mathematical ability through an archaeological approach. We recognize and discuss the association between the discourse of mathematical ability and the three following discourses: standardizing as a means of effectiveness, the distinction between manual and intellectual labor and the “superiority” of mathematical engagement. Moreover, we distinguish between two forms of the discourse of mathematical ability: the biological determination of giftedness and the notion of ability within a meritocratic context. These discourses function as an obstacle in the formation of positive identities in relation to mathematics for students of certain backgrounds. We argue that the deconstruction of these discourses is a necessary condition for an equitable mathematics education.