Changes of teachers’ discursive practices learning dynamic mathematics in a collaborative, online environment

Referencias

BERG, B. L.; LUNE, H. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson, 2012. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE. (2011). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved, 2011. From CONFERENCE BOARD OF THE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES. The mathematical education of teachers II. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society, 2012. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), p. 6-28, 2006. HSIEH, H.; SHANNON, S. F. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), p. 1277-1288, 2005. LABORDE, C. The Role and Uses of Technologies in Mathematics Classrooms: Between Challenge and Modus Vivendi. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 7(1), p. 68-92, 2007. LEE, H.; HOLLEBRANDS, K. Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: An integrated approach to developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), p. 326-341, 2008. MARTIN, L.; TOWERS, J.; PIRIE, S. Collective mathematical understanding as improvisation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), p. 149-183, 2006. Michaels, S.; O'Connor, C.; Resnick, L. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), p. 283-297, 2007. MISHRA, P.; KOEHLER, M. J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), p. 1017–1054, 2006 POWELL, A. B. Socially emergent cognition: Particular outcome of student-to-student discursive interaction during mathematical problem solving. Horizontes, 24(1), p. 33-42, 2006. POWELL, A. B.; GRISI-DICKER, L. Toward collaborative, discourse-focused learning with dynamic geometry environments. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seoul, Korea, 2012. POWELL, A. B.; LAI, F. Inscriptions, Mathematical Ideas and Reasoning in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying Virtual Math Teams (p. 237-259) New York: Spring, 2009. RESNICK, L. B.; MICHAELS, S.; O'CONNOR, M. C. How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In D. D. Preiss & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (p. 163-194). New York: Springer, 2010. SFARD, A. There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), p. 13-57, 2001. SFARD, A. Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2008. SILVERMAN, J. Supporting the Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching through Online Asynchronous Collaboration. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30, p. 61-78, 2011. STAHL, G. Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, p. 79-90, 2005. STAHL, G. (Ed.). Studying Virtual Math Teams. New York: Springer, 2009. STAHL, G. How a virtual math team structured its problem solving. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2011). Hong Kong, China. Proceedings p. 256-263, 2011.