A aprendizagem dos números racionais com compreensão envolvendo um processo de modelação emergente

Referencias

ANDERSON, T.; SHATTUCK, J. Design-based research a decade of progress in education research?. Educational Researcher, Washington, v. 41, n. 1, p. 16-25, feb. 2012. AERA. Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, Washington, v. 40, n. 3, p. 145-156, apr. 2011. BEHR, M. et al. Rational number concepts. In: LESH, R.; LANDAU, M. (Ed.). Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes. New York: Ed. Academic Press, 1983. p. 91-126. BOAVIDA, A. M. et al. A Experiência Matemática no Ensino Básico. 1.ª. ed. Lisboa: ME/DGIDC, 2008. 135 p. BOGDAN, R.; BIKLEN, S. A Investigação Qualitativa em Educação. 1.ª. ed. Porto: Porto Editora, 1994. 335 p. BROCARDO, J. Trabalhar os números racionais numa perspetiva de desenvolvimento do sentido de número. Educação e Matemática, Lisboa, v. 109, p. 15-23, set./out. 2010. BROCARDO, J.; SERRAZINA, L. O sentido de número no currículo de Matemática. In: BROCARDO, J.; SERRAZINA, L.; ROCHA, I. (Org.). O sentido do número: reflexões que entrecruzam teoria e prática. Lisboa: Ed. Escolar, 2008. p. 97-115. BRUNER, J. The process of education. 1.ª. ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976. 128 p. COBB, P.; JACKSON, K.; DUNLAP, C. Design research: an analysis and critique. In: ENGLISH, L. D.; KIRSHNER, D. (Ed.). Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2016. p. 481-503. COBB, P. et al. Participating in classroom mathematical practices. In: YACKEL, E.; GRAVEMEIJER, K.; SFARD, A. (Ed.). A Journey in Mathematics Education Research: insights from the work of Paul Cobb. New York: Ed. Springer, 2001. p. 117-163. CONFREY, J.; LACHANCE, A. Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture-driven research design. In: KELLY, A.; LESH, R. (Ed.). Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah: Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. p. 231-266. FOSNOT, C. T.; DOLK, M. Young Mathematicians at Work: constructing fractions, decimals and percents. 1.ª. ed. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2002. 171 p. GALEN, F. et al. Fractions, percentages, decimals and proportions: a learning-teaching trajectory for grade 4, 5 and 6. 1.ª. ed. Rotterdam: Sense, 2008. 163 p. GRAVEMEIJER, K. What makes mathematics so difficult, and what can we do about it? In: SANTOS, L.; CANAVARRO, A. P.; BROCARDO, J. (Ed.). Educação Matemática: caminhos e encruzilhadas. Lisboa: Ed. APM, 2005. p. 83-101. GRAVEMEIJER, K.; COBB, P. Design research from a learning design perspective. In: AKKER, J. et al. (Ed.). Educational Design Research. New York: Ed. Routledge, 2006. p 17-51. HOWDEN, H. Teaching number sense. Arithmetic Teacher, Reston, v. 36, n. 6, p. 6-11, feb. 1989. HUNTER, R.; ANTHONY, G. Percentages: a foundation for supporting students' understanding of decimals. In: CONFERENCE OF THE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION RESEARCH GROUP OFAUSTRALASIA, 26, 2003, Geelong. Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Geelong: MERGA, 2003. p. 452-459. LAMON, S. J. Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding: essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. 2.ª. ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006. 237 p. MCINTOSH, A.; REYS, J.; REYS, E. A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of athematics, White Rock, v. 12, n. 3, p. 2-8 e 44, nov. 1992. MONTEIRO, C.; PINTO, H. A aprendizagem dos números racionais. Quadrante, Lisboa, v. 14, n. 1, p. 89-108, jan./jun. 2005. MOSS, J.; CASE, R. Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: a new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 30, n. 2, p. 122-147, mar.1999. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS. Developing EssentialUnderstanding of Rational Numbers for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. 2.ª. ed. Reston: NCTM, 2010. 50 p. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS. Principles to Actions: ensuring mathematical success for all. 1.ª. ed. Reston: NCTM, 2014. 140 p. PARKER, M.; LEINHARDT, G. Percent: a privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, Pensilvânia, v. 65, n. 4, p. 421-481, winter. 1995. PONTE, J. P. et al. Investigação baseada em design para compreender e melhorar as práticas educativas. Quadrante, Lisboa, vol. XXV, n. 2, p. 77-98, 2.º semestre. 2016. PONTE, J. P.; SERRAZINA, M. L. Didáctica da Matemática do 1.º ciclo. 1.ª. ed. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta, 2000. 257 p. PORTUGAL. Ministério da Educação. Programa de Matemática do Ensino Básico. Lisboa: DGIDC, 2007. SIMON, M. Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 26, n. 2, p. 114-145, march. 1995. TRIPATHI, P. Developing mathematical understanding through multiple representations.Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, Reston, v. 13, n. 8, p. 438-445, april. 2008. VAMVAKOUSSI, X.; DOOREN, W. V.; VERSCHAFFEL, L. Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Amsterdam, v. 31, p. 344-355, march. 2012. VAN DEN HEUVEL-PANHUIZEN, M. The Didactical use of models in Realistic Mathematics Education: an example from longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, v. 54, n. 1, p. 9-35, nov. 2003. WOOD, T. Creating a context for argument in mathematics class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 30, n. 2, p. 171-191, march. 1999.