Conocimientos desplegados por estudiantes de pedagogía en educación primaria al diseñar una tarea matemática

Referencias

ÁVALOS, B.; MATUS, C. La formación inicial docente en Chile desde una óptica internacional: Informe nacional del estudio internacional IEA TEDS-M. Santiago, n. 10, Chile: Ministerio de Educación, 2010. BAUMERT, J.; KUNTER, M. Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Norway, v. 9, n. 4, p. 469-520, 2006. BLÖMEKE, S. et al. The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 56, p. 35-46, 2016. BLÖMEKE, S. et al. Teacher change during induction: Development of beginning primary teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and performance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Norway, v. 13, n. 2, p. 287-308, 2015. BLÖMEKE, S. et al. TEDS-M 2008. Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Primarstufenlehrkräfte im internationalen Vergleich. Múnster: Waxmann, 2010. BOSTON, M. et al. Comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, Reston, v. 3, n. 2, p.154-175, 2015. BOYD, D. et al. “Teacher Preparation and Student Achievment”. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Washington, v. 31, n. 4, p. 416-440, 2009. CLARKE, B. et al. Tasks in primary mathematics teacher education. 1. ed. New York: Springer, 2009. CHAPMAN, O. Mathematics teacher educator's learning from research on their instructional practices. In: JAWORSKY, B.; WOOD, T. The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional. Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2008. p. 115-134. DOYLE, W. Academic work. Review of educational research, Washington, v. 53, n. 2, p. 159-199, 1983. DOYLE, W. Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction.Educational Psychologist, Washington, v. 23, n. 2, p. 167-180, 1988. FERRINI-MUNDY, J. et al. Knowing Mathematics: What We Can Learn from Teachers. PROM/SE Research Report. 2. ed. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 2006. FINCH, W; FRENCH, B. Latent variable modeling with R. 1. ed. Routledge, 2015. GAETE, A. et al. ¿Qué le piden los profesores a la formación inicial docente en Chile? Centro de Políticas Públicas UC, Santiago, n. 86. Temas de la Agenda Pública, 2016. HAGGARTY, L.; PEPIN, B. An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British educational research journal, vol. 28, no 4, p. 567-590, 2002. HIEBERT, J.; LEFEVRE, P. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis. In: HIEBERT, J. (Ed.). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986. p. 1-27. HIEBERT, J.; WEARNE, D. Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American educational research journal, Washington, v. 30, n. 2, p. 393- 425, 1993. JAWORSKI, B. Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of mathematics teacher education, Reston, v. 9, n. 2, p. 187-211, 2007. KÖNIG, J; BLÖMEKE, S. Future teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge from a comparative perspective: does school experience matter? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, Norway, v. 44, n. 3, p. 341-354, 2012. KUNTER, M. et al. Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, Washington, v. 105, n. 3, p. 805, 2013. LILJEDAHL, P. et al. Inteweaving mathematics and pedagogy in task design: A tale of one task.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Reston, v. 10 n. 4-6, p. 239-249, 2007. MA, L. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. 1. ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. MAGIDSON, J.; VERMUNT, J. K. Latent class models. In: Kaplan, D. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousands Oakes: Sage, 2004. p. 175-198 MAYRING, P. Qualitative content analysis – Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, 2014. Disponible en:. Acceso en: 15 Marz. 2016. MINEDUC. Informe de la Comisión sobre Formación Inicial Docente (documento no oficial). Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Educación, 2005. MINEDUC. Resultados Evaluación Inicia 2014. Santiago: Ministerio de Educación, 2015. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM). Principles to actions:Ensuring mathematical success for all. 1. ed. Reston, Va. 2014. PEPIN, B. Enhancing mathematics/STEM education: a “resourceful” approach. 1.ed. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2015. PEPIN, B. et al. Re-sourcing teacher work and interaction: new perspectives on resource design, use and teacher collaboration. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, Norway, v. 45, . 7, p. 929-943, 2013. ROST, J. Test theory and test construction. 1. ed. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber, 2004. SCHMIDT, W. H. et al. Many Visions, Many Aims: Volume 2: A Cross-National Investigation of Curricular Intensions in School Science. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997. SCHOENBERG, N. E.; RAVDAL, H. Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinalresearch. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 63-74, 2000. SHIMIZU, Y. et al. Mathematical tasks in classrooms around the world. 1. ed. Sense Publishers, 2010. SHULMAN, L. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, Washington, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4-14, 1986. STEIN, M. K. et al. Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American educational research journal, Washington, v. 33, n. 2, p. 455-488, 1996. STEIN, M. K.; LANE, S. Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, Washington, v. 2, n. 1, p. 50-80, 1996. STEIN, M. K.; SMITH, M. S. Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, Reston, v. 3, n. 4, p. 268-275, 1998. SULLIVAN, P.et al. Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. 1. ed. Berlin: Springer, 2012. TATTO, M. T. et al. Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-MM). 1. ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 2012. TATTO, M.T. et al. Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University, 2008. THANHEISER, E. Developing prospective teachers’ conceptions with well-designed tasks: Explaining successes and analyzing conceptual difficulties. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Reston, v. 18, n. 2, p. 141-172, 2015. WATSON, A.; OHTANI, M. Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study. 1. ed. Berlin: Springer, 2015. WEINERT, F. Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In: RYCHEN, D; SALGANIK, L.Defining and selecting key competencies. 1. ed. Göttingen: Hogrefe; Huber, 2001. p. 45- 66. WILLIAMS, G.; CLARKE, D. The complexity of mathematics tasks. In: SCOTT, N; HOLLINGSWORTH, H. Mathematics: Creating the future. Melbourne: Australia, 1997. p. 451-457. ZASLAVSKY, O.; SULLIVAN, P. Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics: Tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning. 1. ed. Berlin: Springer, 2011.