Enfoque ontosemiótico en educación matemática

Referencias

Arnon, I., Cotrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Octaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., y Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. Arsac, G. (1992). The evolution of a theory in didactics: the example of didactic transposition. En R. Douady y A. Mercier (Eds.). Research in Didactique of Matemamatics. Selected Papers. La Pensée Sauvage. 457 Asenova, M., D’Amore, B. Fandiño, M. I., Fúneme, C. C., Iori, M. y Santi, G. (2024). Teorías relevantes en Educación Matemática. Magisterio Editorial. Beltrán-Pellicer, P., y Godino, J. D. (2020). An onto-semiotic approach to the analysis of the affective domain in mathematics education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 1-20. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., y Presmeg, N. (2015. Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Examples of methodology and methods. Springer. Bosch, M. y Gascón, J. (2005). La praxeología local como unidad de análisis de los procesos didácticos. En C. de Castro y M. Gómez (Eds.). Análisis del currículo actual de matemáticas y posibles alternativas (pp. 135-159). Edebé. Breda, A., Bolondi, G., y Abreu Silva, R. De (2021). Enfoque ontossemiótico da cognição e instrução matemática: um estudo metanalítico das teses produzidas no Brasil. Revemop, 3, e202117. Brousseau, G. (1983). Les obstacles épistémologiques et les problèmes en mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 4 (2), 165-198. Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33-115. Brousseau, G. (2002). The theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer. Bunge, M. (1983). Epistemology and methodology II: Understanding the world. Treatise on Basic Philosophy (Vol. 6). Springer. Burgos, M., Bueno, S., Godino, J. D., y Pérez, O. (2021). Onto-semiotic complexity of the Definite Integral. Implications for teaching and learning Calculus. REDIMAT - Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 4-40 Cañón, C. (1993). La matemática: creación y descubrimiento. Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12 (1), 73-112. Chevallard, Y. (1997). Familière et problématique, la figure du professeur. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 17(3), 17-54. 458 Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19 (2), 221-266. Chevallard, Y. (2009). La notion d’ingénierie didactique, un concept à refonder. Questionnement et éléments de réponse à partir de la TAD. 15e École d’Été de Didactique des Mathématiques. Clermont-Ferrand. On line, http://yves. chevallard.free.fr/. Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the Didactic: an attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71-114. Cohen, L., Manion, L., y Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., y Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167-192. D’Ambrósio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44-48. D’Ambrósio, U., y Knijnik, G. (2020). Ethnomathematics. En S. Lerman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 283-288). Springer. D’Amore, B., y Radford L. (2017). Enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas: problemas semióticos, epistemológicos y prácticos. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Bogotá, Colombia. Dubinsky, E. (1984). The cognitive effect of computer experiences on learning abstract mathematical concepts. Korkeakouluj. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. En D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Kluwer. Dubinsky, E., y McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. En D. Holton (Ed.). The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 275-282). Springer. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée : registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Peter Lang. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 459 Font, V., y Contreras, Á. (2008). The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 33-52, 2008. Font, V., Godino, J. D., y Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 97-124. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Reidel Publishing. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Reidel Publishing. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Kluwer. Gerdes, P. (1996). Ethnomathematics and mathematics education. En A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 909-943). Kluwer. Godino, J. D. (2022). Emergencia, estado actual y perspectivas del enfoque ontosemiótico en educación matemática. Revista Venezolana de Investigación en Educación Matemática (REVIEM), 2(2), 1-24-e202201. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., Burgos, M., y Gea, M. M. (2021). Una perspectiva ontosemiótica de los problemas y métodos de investigación en educación matemática. Revemop, 3, e202107, p. 1-30. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. y Font, V. (2019). The onto-semiotic approach: implications for the prescriptive character of didactics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39 (1), 37-42. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., Burgos, M. y Wilhelmi, M. R. (2024). Understanding the Onto-semiotic Approach in mathematics education through the lens of the Cultural Historical Activity Theory. ZDM-Mathematics Education. Godino, J. D., Beltrán-Pellicer, P. y Burgos, M. (2020). Concordancias y complementariedades entre la Teoría de la Objetivación y el Enfoque Ontosemiótico. RECME. Revista Colombiana de Matemática Educativa, 5 (2), 51-66. Godino, J. D., y Burgos, M. (2020). ¿Cómo enseñar las matemáticas y las ciencias experimentales? Resolviendo el dilema de la indagación y transmisión. Paradigma, 41, 80-106. Godino, J. D., Burgos, M., y Gea, M. M. (2022). Analysing theories of meaning in mathematics education from the onto-semiotic approach. Internatio- 460 nal Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(10), 2609-2636. Godino, J. D., Contreras, A., y Font, V. (2006). Análisis de procesos de instrucción basado en el enfoque ontológico-semiótico de la cognición matemática. Recherches en Didactiques des Mathematiques, 26 (1), 39-88. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., Contreras, A., Estepa, A. Lacasta, E., y Wilhelmi, M. R. (2013). Didactic engineering as design-based research in mathematics education. En Ubuz, B., Haser, C., y Mariotti, M. A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (p. 2810-2819). Middle East Technical University and ERME. http:// cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG16/WG16_Godino.pdf Godino, J. D., Rivas, H., Arteaga, P., Lasa, A., y Wilhelmi, M. R. (2014). Ingeniería didáctica basada en el enfoque ontológico-semiótico del conocimiento y la instrucción matemáticos. Recherches en didactique des Mathématiques, 34(2/3), 167-200. Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Swars, S. L., y Smith, M. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education (1995-2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 26-41. Inglis, M., y Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462-500. Johnson, R. B., y Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Kaiber, C. T., Lemos, A., y Pino-Fan, L. (2017). Enfoque ontossemiótico do conhecimento e da instrução matemática (EOS): um panorama das pesquisas na América Latina. Perspectivas da Educação Matemática, 10(23), 531-552. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., y Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Routledge. Knijnik, G. (2012). Differentially positioned language games: ethnomathematics from a philosophical perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80 (1-2), 87-100. 461 Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. En J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Ablex. Leontiev, A. N. (1993). Actividad, conciencia y personalidad. ASBE Editorial. Michie, S., West, R., Campbell, R., Brown, J. y Gainforth, H. (2014). ABC of behaviour change theories. Silverback Publishing Núñez, I. (2009). Activity theory and the utilisation of the activity system according to the mathematics educational community. Educate (Special issue, December 2009), 7-20. http://www.educatejournal.org/7 Oliveras, M. L., y Godino, J. D. (2015). Comparando el programa etnomatemático y el enfoque ontosemiótico: Un esbozo de análisis mutuo. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 8(2), 432-449 Phan, T. T., Do, T. T., Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Do, B. C., y Nguyen, T. T. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education in Scopus database between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133-1149. Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. En L. Radford, G. Schubring y F. Seeger (Eds.). Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215-234). Sense Publishers Radford, L. (2014). De la teoría de la objetivación. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 7(2), 132-150. Radford, L. (2018). On theories in mathematics education and their conceptual differences. En, B. Sirakov, P. de Souza, y M. Viana (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Vol. 4, pp. 4055-4074). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Rosa, M. y Shirley, L. (2016). In guise of conclusion. En M. Rosa et al. (Eds.). Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Springer. Roth, W-M. y Lee, Y-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232. Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Methods. En F. K. Lester (Ed.). Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 66-110). NCTM y IAP (Information Age Publishing Inc.), 2007. 462 Sierpinska, A. y Lerman, S. (1996). Epistemologies of mathematics and of mathematics education. En A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 827-876). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1996. Snow, R. E., y Lohman, D. R. (1991). Implication of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. En R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (Third ed.) (pp. 263-331). American Council on Education and Macmillan Publ. Stokes, D. (1997). Paster’s quadrant. Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction - the Wiskobas project. D. Reidel Publishing. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., M. y Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. En S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8 Vergel, R., Godino, J. D., Font, V., y Pantano, O. L. (2023). Comparing the views of the theory of objectification and the onto-semiotic approach on the school algebra nature and learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(3), 475-496. Vergnaud, G. (1990). La théorie des champs conceptuels. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 10(2-3), 133-170. Verón (2023). Modelo ontosemiótico del concepto de diferencial. Implicaciones para la formación de profesores de matemática. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Argentina. https://www.ugr.es/local/fqm126/tesis/ Tesis_A.Ver%C3%B3n.pdf Verón, M. A., y Giacomone, B. (2021). Análisis de los significados del concepto de diferencial desde una perspectiva ontosemiótica. Revemop, 3, e202109. Verón, M. A., Giacomone, B., y Pino-Fan, L. R. (2024). Guía de valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de la diferencial. Uniciencia, 38(1), 1-22. Vilela, D. (2010). Discussing a philosophical background for the ethnomathematical program. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 345-358. 463 Vithal, R. y Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of Ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34 (2), 131-158. Webb, N. L. (1992). Assessment of student’s knowledge of mathematics: step toward a theory. En D. A. Grouws. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan. Wheeler, D. (1993). Epistemological issues and challenges to assessment: What is mathematical knowledge? En M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education. An ICMI Study. Kluwer A.P.