Equações quadráticas e a fórmula de Bhaskara: sucesso garantido?

Referencias

Cortés, A., & Pfaff, N. (2000). Solving equations and inequations: operational invariants and methods constructed by students. Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2, Hiroshima, Japan: PME, 193-200. Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations, the transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics , 9 (2), 19-25. Freitas, M. A. (2002). Equação do primeiro grau: métodos de resolução e análise de erros no ensino médio. Master Dissertation (Mathematics Education), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP, São Paulo. Gray, E., & Tall, D. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: a Proceptual View of Simple Arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 26 (2), 115-141. Gray, E., & Tall, D. (2001). Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: an explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics. Proceedings fo the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2, 65-72. Ultrech: PME Lima, R. N. (2007). Equações Algebricas no Ensino Médio: Uma jornada por diferentes mundos da Matemática. Tese de Doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo. Lima, R. N., & Healy, L. (2010). The didactic cut in equation solving or a gap between the embodied and the symbolic mathematical worlds? Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Belo Horizonte: UFMG. Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 67 (1), 3-18. Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2006). The concept of equations: what have students met before? Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 233-241. Prague, Czech Republic. Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2006). What does equation mean? A brainstorm of the concept. 3rd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at Undergraduation Level. Istambul, Turquia: ICTM. Linchevski, L., & Sfard, A. (1991). Rules without reasons as processes without objects - The case of equations and inequalities. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2, 317-324. Assisi, Itália: PME. Payne, S. J., & Squibb, H. R. (1990). Algebra mal-rules and cognitive accounts of error. Cognitive Science , 445-448. Sleeman, D. (s.d.). An attempt to understand students' understanding of basic algebra. Cognitive Science , 8, 387-412. Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in Mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 12, 151-169. Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 281-288. Bergen. Thorpe, J. A. (1989). Algebra: What sould we teach and how should we teach it? In: S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra, Vol. 4, 11-24. EUA: NCTM. Vlassis, J. (2002). The balance model: hindrance or supprt for the solving of linear equations with one unknown. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 49, 341-359. Watson, A., Spyrou, P., & Tall, D. (2003). The relationship between physical embodiment and mathematical symbolism: The concept of vector. The Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics Education , 1 (2), 73-97.