Forms of generalization in students experiencing mathematical learning difficulties

Referencias

Atkinson, B. (1984). Learning disabled students and Logo. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(8), 500-501. Baccaglini-Frank, A., Antonini, S., Robotti, E., & Santi, G. (2014). Juggling reference frames in the microworld Mak-Trace: The case of a student with MLD. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 81-88). Vancouver, Canada: PME. Canevaro, A. (1999). Pedagogia speciale: la riduzione dell’handicap [Special pedagogy: the reduction of handicap]. Milan, Roma: Edizioni Bruno Mondadori. Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth-First Annual Meeting North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3-26). Cuernavaca, Mexico: PME. Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139-162. Giorgi, G., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2011). Mak-Trace. [Application]. Available from: http://itunes.apple.com/it/app/maktrace/id467939313?m t=8. Grush, R. (2000). Self, world, and space: The meaning and mechanisms of ego- and allocentric spatial representation. Brain and Mind, 1, 59-92. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2012). The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics-teacher?student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 341-368. Ilyenkov, E. (1977). ‘The concept of the ideal’, in Philosophy in the USSR: Problems of dialectical materialism. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers. Kieran, C. (1989) A perspective on algebraic thinking. In G. Vern, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 163-171). Paris, France: Laboratoire PSYDEE. Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K. Hart (Ed.), Children's understanding of mathematics 11-16 (pp. 102-119). London, United Kingdom: Murray. Küchemann, D., & Hoyles, C. (2009). From empirical to structural reasoning in mathematics: Tracking changes over time. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades. A K-16 perspective (pp. 171-191). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Laborde, C. (1993). The Computer as part of the learning environment: The case of geometry. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (Vol. 121, pp. 48-67). Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Maddux, C. (1984). Using microcomputers with the learning disabled: Will the potential be realized? Educational Computer, 4(1), 31-32. Michayluk, J. O., & Saklofske, D. H. (1988). Logo and special education. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 4(1), 43-48. Miller, P. (2009). Learning with a missing sense: What can we learn from the interaction of a deaf child with a turtle? American Annals of the Deaf, 154(1), 71-82. Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) (2012). La via italiana all’inclusione scolastica, Seminario Nazionale [Italian way to scholar inclusion, National Seminary], Roma, Italy. Accessed on May 12, 2014: http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/istruzione/disabilita/inclusione-scolastica. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York, NY: Basic Books. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70. Radford, L. (2004). La généralisation mathématique comme processus sémiotique [Mathematical generalization as a semiotic process]. In G. Arrigo (Ed.), Atti del convegno di didattica della matematica 2004, Alta Scuola Pedagogica (pp. 11-27). Locarno, Switzerland: Divisione della scuola. Centro didattico cantonale. Radford, L. (2005). Body, tool, and symbol: Semiotic reflections on cognition. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 111-117). Québec, Canada: CMESG. Radford, L (2006). The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 39-65. Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215-234). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Ratcliff, C., & Anderson, S.E. (2011). Reviving the turtle: Exploring the use of Logo with students with mild disabilities. Computers in the Schools, 28(3), 241-255. Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural historical perspective on teaching and learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Russell, S. J. (1986). But what are they learning? The dilemma of using microcomputers in special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9(2), 100-104. Sfard, A. (2014, April). Conversation: Anna Baccaglini-Frank’s questions about learning difficulties in mathematics. Work presented at the Naples’s Seminar at the University Federico II, Naples, Italy. Vasu, E. S., & Tyler, D. K. (1997). A comparison of the critical thinking skills and spatial ability of fifth grade children using simulation software or Logo. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8(4), 345-363. Vygotsky, L. (1929). The fundamental problems of defectology. Retrieved online April 24, 2014, from: http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1929 /defectology/ Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Eds. and Trans.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.