Modelo de análisis de videos para el estudio de procesos de construcción de conocimiento matemático

Referencias

Bielaczyc, K. y A. Collins (1999), “Learning Communities in Classrooms: A Reconceptualization of Educational Practices”, en C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Londres, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 269-292. Brodie, K. (2001), “Teacher Intervention in Small-Group Work”, For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 20, núm. 1, pp. 9-16. Castelnuovo, E. (1993), Pentole, ombre e formiche, Italia, Nuova Italia. César, M. e I. Oliveira (2005), “The Curriculum as a Tool for Inclusive Participation: Students’ Voices in a Case Study in a Portuguese Multicultural School”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20, núm. 1, pp. 29-44. Clement, J. (2000), “Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and Model Viability”, en A.E. Kelly y R. Lesh (eds.), Handbook of Research Data Design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 547-589. Cobb, P. y J.W. Whitenack (1996), “A Method for Conducting Longitudinal Analysis of Classroom Video recordings and Transcripts”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 30, núm. 1, pp. 213-228. Dekker, R. y M. Elshout-Mohr (2004), “Teacher Interventions Aimed at Mathematical Level Raising during Collaborative Learning”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 56, núm. 1, pp. 39-65. Dörfler, W. (2000), “Means for Meaning”, en P. Cobb, E. Yackel y K. McClain (eds.), Symbolizing and Communicating in Mathematics Classrooms: Perspectives on Discourse, Tools, and Instructional Design, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 99-131. Elbers, E. y M. de Haan (2005), “The Construction of Word Meaning in a Multicultural Classroom: Mediational Tools in Peer Collaboration during Mathematics Lessons”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20, núm. 1, pp. 45-60. Forman, E. A. y E. Ansell (2002), “Orchestrating the Multiple Voices and Inscriptions of a Mathematics Classroom”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 11, núms. 2-3, pp. 251-274. Freire, S. y M. César (2003), “Inclusive Ideals/Inclusive Practices: How Far is Dream from Reality? — Five Comparative Case Studies”, European Journal of Special Needs Education, vol. 18, núm. 3, pp. 341-354. Kumpulainen, K. (2005), “When Effective Becomes Meaningful and when Learning Becomes Participation: Conceptual Shifts in Research on Social Interaction in Learning and Instruction”, en C.P. Constatinou y otros (eds.), Integrating Multiple Perspectives on Effective Learning Environments, Nicosia, University of Cyprus, pp. 339-349. Lerman, S. (2001), “Accounting for Accounts of Learning Mathematics: Reading the ZPD in Videos and Transcripts”, en D. Clarke (ed.), Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53-74. Lerman, S. y R. Zevenbergen (2004), “The Socio-political Context of the Mathematics Classroom: Using Bernstein’s Theoretical Framework to Understand Classroom Communications”, en P. Valero y R. Zevenbergen (eds.), Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education: Issues of Power in Theory and Methodology, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 27-42. Loizos, P. (2000), “Video, Film and Photographs as Research Documents”, en M.W. Bauer y G. Gaskell (eds.), Qualitative Research with Text, Image and Sound, Londres, Sage, pp. 44-66. Morera, D. (2001), “El informe sociométrico en el contexto escolar”, en A. Rodríguez y D. Morera (eds.), El sociograma: estudio de las relaciones informales en las organizaciones, Madrid, Pirámide, pp. 123-148. O’Toole, S. y G. Abreu (2005), “Parents’ Past Experiences as a Mediational Tool for Understanding their Child’s Current Mathematical Learning”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20, núm. 1, pp. 75-90. Pirie, S.E.B. (1998), “Where do We Go from Here?”, en A.R. Teppo (ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Mathematics Education, Reston, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 156-163. Planas, N. (2001), Obstacles en l’aprenentatge matemàtic: la diversitat d”interpretacions de la norma, tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, España. –––––– (2004), “Metodología para analizar la interacción entre lo cultural, lo social y lo afectivo en educación matemática”, Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 19-36. –––––– (2005), “El papel del discurso en la construcción del Discurso de la práctica matemática”, Cultura y Educación, vol. 17, núm. 1, pp. 19-34. Powell, A.B. (2003), “So Let’s Prove It!” Emergent and Elaborated Mathematical Ideas and Reasoning in the Discourse and Inscriptions of Learners Engaged in a Combinatorial Task, tesis doctoral, The State University of New Jersey, Estados Unidos. Powell, A.B. y C.A. Maher (2002), “Inquiry into the Interlocution of Students Engaged with Mathematics: Appreciating links between Research and Practice”, en D.S. Mewborn y otros (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the PME Group, Columbus, Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, pp. 317-329. Powell, A.B., J.M. Francisco, y C.A. Maher (2003), “An Analytical Model for Studying the Development of Learners’ Mathematical Ideas and Reasoning Using Videotape Data”, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 22, núm. 4, pp. 405-435. Prenzel, M. y T. Seidel (2002), “Videostudie zum Physikunterricht”, Lehrerinfo, vol. 4, p. 4. Roschelle, J. (2000), “Choosing and Using Video Equipment for Data Collection”, en A.E. Kelly y R. Lesh (eds.), Handbook of Research Data Design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 709-731. Ryve, A. (2004), “Can Collaborative Concept Mapping Create Mathematically Productive Discourses?”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 56, núm. 3, pp. 157-177. Seidel, T., M. Prenzel y L. Hoffmann (2001), “A Videotape Classroom Study about Teaching and Learning in Physics Classes: Teaching Characteristics and Student’s Cognitive Learning Activities”, en M. Grossen y otros (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Fribourg, University of Fribourg, pp. 35-39. Sfard, A. (2001), “There is More to Discourse than Meets the Ears: Looking at Thinking as Communication to Learn More about Mathematical Learning”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 46, núm. 1, pp. 13-57. Stigler, J.W., P. Gonzales, T. Kawanaka, S. Knoll y A. Serrano (1999), The TIMMS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States, Washington, Department of Education, National Cen- ter for Education Statistics. Ten Dam, G., M. Volman y W. Wardekker (2004), “Making Sense through Participation: Social Differences in Learning and Identity Development”, en J. van der Linden y P. Renshaw (eds.), Dialogic Learning: Shifting Perspectives to Learning, Instruction, and Teaching, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 63-85. Van der Linden, J., G. Erkens, H. Schmidt y P. Renshaw (2000), “Collaborative Learning”, en P. Simons, J. van der Linden y T. Duffy (eds.), New Learning, Dor- drecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 37-54. White, D. (2003), “Promoting Productive Mathematical Classroom Discourse with Diverse Students”, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 37-53. Wood, T. (1999), “Creating a Context for Argument in Mathematics Class”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 171-191.