Paths to the present
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Stanic, Georg M. A y Kilpatrick, Jeremy
Resumen
Reform may be too strong a word to characterize any developments in mathematics education in the United States from the turn of the twentieth century to the beginning of the third millennium. School mathematics has continually changed (especially in terms of decisions that have been made in response to perceived changes in the school population), but change should not be confused with reform. The basic form of school mathematics remains much like what is was at the end of the nineteenth century. Even substantial attempts to unify the mathematics curriculum in the early 1900s and to modernize it in the 1950s and 1960s yielded only surface, temporary, or localized changes. The rhetoric of reform tends to paper over important differences among reformers, and attempts to implement reform have largely ignored the wider social, political, and economic context. As of 1995, when this article was first published, it was not clear that reformers in the standards movement of the late twentieth century would be any more successful than their forebears.
Fecha
2005
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Documentos curriculares | Gestión y calidad | Historia de la Educación Matemática | Legislación educativa
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Educación infantil, preescolar (0 a 6 años) | Educación primaria, escuela elemental (6 a 12 años) | Educación secundaria básica (12 a 16 años)
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Referencias
ASTIN, C. M. (1921). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, n. 14, pp. 1-4. (1928). Historical Account to the Origin and growth of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, n. 21, pp. 204-213. BRESLICH, E. R. (1920). Correlation of Mathematics Subjects. School Science and Mathematics, n. 20, pp. 125-134. (1916). Forward Movement in Secondary Mathematics. School Review, n. 24, pp. 283-297. CARNEGIE TASK FORCE ON TEACHING AS A PROFESSION (1983). A National Prepared: Teachers for the 21s Century. New York, College Board. COLLEGE BOARD (1983). Academic Preparation for College: What Students Need to Know and Be Able to Do.New York, College Board. CONFERENCE BOARD OF THE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (1982). The Mathematical Sciences Curriculum K-12: What Is Still Fundamental and What Is Not. Washington, D.C., The Board. COUNTS, G. S. (1926). “Current Practices in Curriculum-Making, in Public High School”. In: Curriculum-Making: Past and Present, Twenty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society Of Education. Edited by G. M. Whipple, Pt.1, pp. 135-162. Bloomington, I11, Public School Publishing. CROSSWHITE, F. J. (1990). National Standards: A New Dimension in Professional Leadership. School Science and Mathematics, n. 90, pp. 454-466. DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (1990). Achieving Our Goals: Superficial or Structural Reforms? Phi Delta Kappan, n. 72, pp. 286-295. DEWEY, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston, Heath. EFFROS, C. G. (1990). Some thoughts on Everybody Counts. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, n. 37, pp. 555-561. FINN, C. E, Jr. (1993). What If Those Math Standards Are Wrong? Education Week, n. 20, pp. 36-26. FINN, C. E, Jr. and REBARBER, T. (1992), “The changing Politics of Education Reform”. In: Education Reform in the 90s. Edited by C. E. Finn, Jr. and Theodor Rebarber, pp.175-193. New York, Macmillan. GOODLAD, J. I. and KEATING, Pamela (eds.) (1990). Access to Knowledge:An Agenda for Our Nation’s Schools. New York, College Board. KILPATRICK, J. (1992). “A History of Research in Mathematics Education”. In: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Edited by Douglas A. Grows, pp. 3-38. New York, Macmillan. MASSEL, D. (1994). Setting Standards in Mathematics and Social studies. Education and Urban Society, n. 26, pp. 118-140. MINNICK, J. H. (1996). Our Critics and Their Viewpoints. Mathematics Teacher, n. 9, pp. 80-84. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION (1983). A National Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office. NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON MATHEMATICAL REQUIREMENTS (1923). The Reorganization of Mathematics in Secondary Education. Washington, D. C., Mathematical Association of America. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SUPERVISORS OF MATHEMATICS (1978). Position Statements ob Basic Skills. Mathematics Teacher, n. 71, pp. 147-152. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (1980). An Agenda for Action Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, Va., The Council. (forthcoming). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.: The Council. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va., The Council. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, Va., The Council. NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD COMMISSION ON PRECOLLEGE EDUCATION IN MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY (1982). Today’s Problem, Tomorrow’s Crises. Washington, D.C., National Science Foundation. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (1980). Science and Engineering Education for the 1980’s and Beyond. Washington, D.C., National Science Foundation. OSBORNE, A. R., and CROSSWHITE, F. J. (1970). “Forces and Issues Related to Curriculum and Instruction, 7-12”. In: A History of Mathematics Education in the United States and Canada. Thirty-second Yearbook the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Edited by Phillip S. Jones, pp. 155-297. Washington, D.C., The Council. PALAIS, E. G. (1989). A Differing View on Mathematics Education Reform. Notices of the American Mathematics Society, n. 36, pp.1889-1991. REEVE, W. D. (1922). The Case for General Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, n. 15, pp. 381-391. (1920). General Mathematics for the High School: Its Purpose and Content. Educational Administration and Supervision, n. 6, pp. 258-273. (1916). Unification and Mathematics for High School. School and Society, n. 4, pp. 203-212. BOGOFF, B. and LAVE, J. (eds.) (1984). Everyday Cognition: Its development in Social Context. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. SIGURDSON, S. E. (1962). “The Development of Idea of Unified Mathematics in Secondary School Curriculum: 1890-1930”. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wiscosin at Madison. Dissertation Abstract International, n. 23, pp. 1997. SMITH, D. E. (1922). Among My Autographs, 26: Burckhardt on Modern Teaching. American Mathematics Monthly, n. 29, pp. 297-299. STANIC, G. M. A. (1986). The Growing Crisis in Mathematics Education in the early Twentieth Century. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, n. 17, pp. 190-205. STANIC, George M. A. and KILPATRICK, J. (1992). Mathematics Curriculum Reform in the United States: A Historical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, n. 5, pp. 407-417. WILSON, P. S. and MOSQUERA PADRON, J. C. (1994). “Moving toward culture-Inclusive Mathematics Education”. In: Multicultural Education: Inclusion of All. Edited by M. M. Atwater, Kelly Radzik-Marsh and Marilyn Strutchens, pp. 39-63. Athens, Ga., University of Georgia, Department of Science Education.