Pisa 2021: knowledge of computational logic in the mathematics exam
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Sápiras, Fernanda Schuck y Bayer, Arno
Resumen
Background: the model question that will be present in the PISA 2021 exam, with the insertion of knowledge related to programming logic in the test that re-analyses mathematical literacy, may not effectively assess the students’ potential mathematical knowledge, as students are led to solving the question by using the data presented in its statement. Objectives: to analyse a model question that will be present in the new form of evaluation of PISA 2021 regarding the insertion of integrated programming logic with the different literacies. Design: we assume a qualitative study, with exploratory and explanatory research, when it incorporates elements of two investigative designs: bibliographic and documentary research. Setting and Participants: the study was developed based on model questions from PISA 2021 provided by the OECD. Data collection and analysis: the question of PISA 2021 is organised with increasing difficulty and the analysis observes how we understand that the result of questions of a programming logic nature in the Mathematics assessment is moving towards the insertion of a new literacy in the assessed role: Digital Literacy. Results: we highlighted three levels of knowledge of programming logic, with emphasis on the imperative paradigm, used for the design of resolution: recognition of patterns, structures of logical controls and representation by variables. Conclusions: we conclude the students need to be able to assess and use the information critically if they want to turn it into knowledge, recognising patterns and inferring a critical position as to its consequences, aspects that cover what we understand as Digital Literacy.
Fecha
2020
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Competencias | Generalización | Instrumentos | Otro (procesos cognitivos) | Pruebas | Teórica
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Educación media, bachillerato, secundaria superior (16 a 18 años) | Educación primaria, escuela elemental (6 a 12 años) | Educación secundaria básica (12 a 16 años)
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
22
Número
5
Rango páginas (artículo)
186-206
ISSN
21787727
Referencias
Almeida, A. C. (2019). O que a prova do Pisa não mostra. Revista VEJA. https://veja. abril.com.br/blog/alberto-carlos-almeida/o-que-a-prova-do-pisa-nao-mostra/ Alves-Mazzotti, A. J., & Gewandsznajder, F. (2002). O Método nas Ciênias Naturais e Sociais. In O Método nas Ciências Naturais e Sociais: Pesquisa Quantitativa e Qualitativa. Pioneira Thompson. Azevedo, F. (2011). Educar para a literacia: perspectivas e desafios. In: Atas do VII Encontro de Educação: Numeracia e Literacia Em Educação. (p. 1–18). Brasil. (2015). Brasil No Pisa 2015: Análises e reflexões sobre o desempenho dos estudantes brasileiros. http://download.inep.gov.br/acoes_internacionais/pisa/ resultados/2015/pisa2015_completo_final_baixa.pdf Brasil. (2019). PISA:Programa Internacional de Avaliação de Alunos 2018. http://portal. mec.gov.br/images/03.12.2019_Pisa-apresentacao-coletiva.pdf Carboni, I. de F. (2015). Lógica de programação. Thomson. Chizzotti, A. (2003). A pesquisa qualitativa em ciências humanas e sociais: evolução e desafio. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 16, 221–236. De Paula, B. H., Valente, J. A., & Burn, A. (2014). O uso de jogos digitais para o desenvolvimento do currículo para a educação computacional na Inglaterra. Curriculo Sem Fronteiras, 14(3), 46–71. Fernandez-Cano, A. (2016). A methodological critique of the PISA evaluations. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 22(1). https://doi. org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8806 Gil, A. C. (2011). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social (6a ed.). Atlas. Goldenberg, M. (2005). A arte de pesquisar: como fazer pesquisa qualitativa em Ciências Sociais. (5a ed.). Record. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Circuit World, 21(1), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1108/ eb046280 Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Computadores, Ferramentas Cognitivas (2, Ed.). Porto Editora. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results : What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en OECD. (2018). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). OECD Education Working Papers, (9), 1–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Rosado, E., & Bélisle, C. (2006). DigEuLit Digital European Literacy. https://halshs. archives-ouvertes.fr/ Sápiras, F. S. (2017). Relações entre a literacia digital e o ambiente scratch: um olhar por meio de perspectivas matemáticas com alunos do sétimo e oitavo anos do ensino fundamental. Dissertação de Mestrado (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática) Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas. Retrieved from http://www.ppgecim.ulbra.br/ teses/index.php/ppgecim/article/view/275 Sápiras, F. S., Dalla Vecchia, R., & Maltempi, M. V. (2015). Utilização do Scratch em sala de aula. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 17, 973–988. Schleicher, A., & Partovi, H. (2019). Computer Science and Pisa 2021. OECD Education Today. https://oecdedutoday.com/computer-science-and-pisa-2021/ Sebesta, R. W. (2018). Conceitos de Linguagem de Programação (11ª ed.). Bookman. Spielmann, R., & Ciani, A. B. (2009). Um olhar sobre algumas questões de Matemática do Exame PISA. (p. 256–273). Valente, J. A. (2016). Integração do Pensamento Computacional no currículo da Educação Básica: Diferentes estratégias usadas e questões de formação de professores e avaliação do aluno. E-Curriculum, 14, 864–897. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/curriculum/ article/view/29051 Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). National and international assessment in Brazil: The link between PISA and IDEB. Educacao and Realidade, 43(4), 1343–1361. https:// doi.org/10.1590/2175-623684893 Wahlström, O. (2017). Mathmatics with graphical programming. http://urn.kb.se/ resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-63683 Wing, J. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227378