Procesos conceptuales y cognitivos en la introducción de las ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias vía la resolución de problemas

Referencias

artigue, M. (1987). Ingenierie didactique a propos d’equations differentielles. En J. Bergeron, N. Herscovics y C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh international conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 236-242. Montreal: Université de Montréal. artigue, M. (1992). Functions from an algebraic and graphic point of view: cognitive difficulties and teaching practices. En G. Harel y E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function. Cognitive difficulties and teaching practices. Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy , MAA Notes 25 pp. 109-132. USA: MAA. azcárate, C. y camacho, M. (2003). Sobre la Investigación en Didáctica del Análisis Matemático. Boletín de la Asociación Matemática Venezolana, 10 (2), pp. 135-149. barrera-mora, F. y santos-trigo, M. (2002). Cualidades y procesos matemáticos importantes en la resolución de problemas: un caso hipotético de suministro de medicamento. Matemáticas Aplicadas y su Enseñanza. Serie Bachillerato, 2, pp. 8-37. México: Grupo Editorial Iberoamericana. camacho, M., perdomo, J. y santos-trigo, M. (2007). La resolución de problemas en los que interviene el concepto de Ecuación Diferencial Ordinaria: Un estudio exploratorio. En M. Camacho, P. Flores y P. Bolea (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática. Comunicaciones de los grupos de investigación. XI Simposio de la SEIEM pp. 87-106. Tenerife. camacho, M., perdomo, J. y santos-trigo, M. (2009). Revisiting university students’ knowledge that involves basic differential equation questions, PNA 3(3), pp. 23-133. cobo, P. y fortuny, J. (2000). Social Interactions and Cognitive Effects in Contexts of Area-Comparison Problem Solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, pp. 115-140. camacho-machín, M.; perdomo-díaz, J. y santos-trigo, M. (2012a) An Exploration of Students´ Conceptual Knowledge Built in a First Ordinary Differential Equations Course (Part I), The Teaching of Mathematics, 15 (1). 1-20. http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/pages/browse_issue.php?db=tm&rbr=28 camacho-machín, M.; perdomo-díaz, J. y santos-trigo, M. (2012b) An Exploration of Students ´ Conceptual Knowledge Built in a First Ordinary Differential Equations Course (Part II), The Teaching of Mathematics, 15 (2). http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/pages/browse_issue.php?db=tm&rbr=28 guerrero, C., camacho, M. y mejía, H. (2010). Dificultades de los estudiantes en la interpretación de las soluciones de Ecuaciones Diferenciales Ordinarias que modelan un problema. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 28(3), pp. 341–352. habre, S. (2000). Exploring Students’ Strategies to Solve Ordinary Differential Equations in a Reforme Setting. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18 (4), pp. 455-472. kwon, O.N., rasmussen, C. y allen, K. (2005). Students’ Retention of Mathematical Knowledge and Skills in Differential Equations. School Science and Mathematics, 105 (5), pp. 1-13. moreno moreno, M. y azcárate giménez, C. (2003). Concepciones y creencias de los profesores universitarios de matemáticas acerca de la enseñanza de las ecuaciones diferenciales. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21(2), pp. 265-280. national council of teachers of mathematics. (2009). Focus in High School Mathematics. Reasoning and Sense Making. USA: NCTM. national research council. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, y B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. nickerson, S. y bowers, J. (2008). Examining Interaction Patterns in College-Level Mathematics Classes: A Case Study. En M. Carlson y C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the Connection. Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (179-190), MAA Notes #73. Washington, DC: MAA. polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton: Princeton University Press. rasmussen, C. (2001). New directions in differential equations. A framework for interpreting students’ understandings and difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, pp. 55-87. rasmussen, C. y blumenfeld, H. (2007). Reinventing solutions to systems of linear differential equations: A case of emergent models involving analytic expressions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, pp. 95-210. rasmussen, C. y kwon, O. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, pp. 89-194. rasmussen, C., kwon, O., allen, K., marrongelle, K. y burtch, M. (2006). Capitalizing on Advances in Mathematics and K-12 Mathematics Education in Undergraduate Mathematics: An Inquiry-Oriented Approach to Differential Equations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), pp. 85-93. rasmussen, C. y ruan, W. (2008). Teaching for Understanding: A Case of Students Learning to Use the Uniqueness Theorem as a Tool in Differential Equations. En M. Carlson y C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the Connection. Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. MAA Notes 73, pp. 153-163. Washington, DC: MAA. rasmussen, C. y whitehead, K. (2003). Learning and Teaching Ordinary Differential Equations. In A. Selden y J. Selden (Eds.), MAA Online Research Sampler. (http://www.maa.org/t_and_l/sampler/ rs_7.html)