Procesos de validación en Geometría en situaciones de conflicto

Referencias

Alibert, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. En D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 215-230). The Netherlands: Kluwer. Balacheff, N. (2000). Procesos de prueba en alumnos de matemáticas. Bogotá: Una Empresa Docente. Bell, A. (1976). A study of pupils’ proof- explanations in mathematics situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 23-40. Chazan, D. (1993), High School Geometry Students’ Justification for their Views of Empirical Evidence and Mathematical Proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387. Duval, R. (2002). Proof understanding in mathematics: What ways for students. En Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Mathematics: Understanding Proving and Proving to Understand (pp. 23–44). Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprension in learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 62, 103-131. Duval, R. (2007). Cognitive functioning and the understanding of mathematical processes of proof. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice Procesos de validación en Geometría en situaciones de conflicto Comunicación XIV CIAEM-IACME, Chiapas, México, 2015. 10 (pp. 137-162). Rotterdam: Sense publishers. Fischbein, E., & Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and Certitude in the Development of Mathematical Thinking. En A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 128-31). Antwerp, Belgium. Hadas, N., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). The role of uncertainty in constructing and proving in computerized environment. Proceedings of the 23th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 3-57). Hadas, N., & Hershkowitz, R. (2002). Activity analyses at the service of task design. En Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 49-56). Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments. Educational studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 127-150. Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2002). Analyses of activity design in geometry in the light of student actions. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 2(4), 529-552. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2, 805-842. Johnsson, D. W. & Johnsson, R. T. (2009). Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38(1), 37-51. Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational studies in mathematics, 44(1-2), 87-125. Mesquita, A. (1998). On conceptual obstacles linked with external representation in geometry. Journal of mathematical behavior, 17(2), 183-195. Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-41. Prusak, N., Hershkowitz R. & Schwarz. (2011). From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design, Educational Studies in Mathematics, published on line 23 de junio de 2011. Radford, L. (2006). Elementos de una teoría cultural de la objetivación. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática educativa, 9(Número especial), 103-129. Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2008). “Cognitive conflict” as a mechanism for supporting developmental progressions in students’ knowledge about proof. Artículo disponible en la página web Del 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, under Topic Study Group 18 (http://tsg.icme11.org/tsg/show/19). Monterrey, México. Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314-352. Vinner, S. (1983). The notion of proof–some aspects of students’ views at the senior high level. En Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 289-294). Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297-321. Zazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. J. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 195-208.