Recursos didácticos y contextos usados por futuros profesores de matemáticas

Referencias

ADLER, J. Conceptualizing resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, South Africa, v. 3, p. 205-224, 2000. BALL, D. L.; LUBIENSKI, S.; MEWBORN, D. Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. En: RICHARDSON, V. (ed.). Handbook of research on teaching. 4. ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 2001. p. 433-456. BALL, D. L.; EIMAN-NEMSER, S. Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, London, v. 18, n. 4, p. 401-423, 1988. BALL, D. L.; COHEN, D. K. Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, Washington, DC, v. 25, n. 9, p. 6–8, 1996. BALL, D. L.; THAMES, M. H.; PHELPS, G. Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, Washington, DC, v. 59, n. 5, p. 389-407, 2008. BARTOLINI BUSSI, M. G.; MARIOTTI, M. A. Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. En: ENGLISH, L.; BARTOLINI BUSSI, M.; JONES, G.; LESH, R.; TIROSH, D. (ed.). Handbook of international research in mathematics education: second revised edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008. p. 746-805. BEN-PERETZ, M. The teacher–curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University New York Press, 1990. BELTRÁN-PELLICER, P.; GIACOMONE, B. Desarrollando la competencia de análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica en un curso de postgrado mediante la discusión de una experiencia de enseñanza. REDIMAT – Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, Barcelona, v. 7, n. 2, p. 111-133, 2018. BERGER, M. The functional use of a mathematical sign. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, v. 55, p. 81-102, 2004. BOALER, J. The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: do they make mathematics more “Real”? For the Learning of Mathematics, New Westminter, v. 13, n. 2, p. 12-17, jun. 1993. BREEN, C. Exploring imagery in P, M and E. En: PEHKONEN, E. (ed.). Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. v. 2. Lahti: University of Helsinki. 1997. p. 97-104. BUCUR, O.; BEAUNE, P.; BOISSIER, O. Définition et représentation du contexte pour des agents sensibles au contexte. En: FRENCH-SPEAKING CONFERENCE ON MOBILITY AND UBIQUITY COMPUTING (UbiMob’05), 2., 2005, Grenoble. Proceedings… Grenoble: Association for Computing MachineryNew York, 2005. p. 13-16. CARRETERO, R.; CORIAT, M; NIETO, P. Secuenciación, Organización de Contenidos y Actividades de Aula. En: Junta de Andalucía (ed.). Materiales Curriculares: Educación Secundaria. v. 17. Junta de Andalucia: Sevilla, 1995. p. 65-173. CARPENTER, T. P.; FRANKE, M. L.; LEVI, L. Thinking Mathematically: Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in Elementary School. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2003. CARTAGENA, L. C.; SOSSA, G. Resolución de problemas asociados al razonamiento algebraico. Trabajo de grado (Licenciatura en Educación Básica con Énfasis en Matemáticas) – Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, 2016. CHRISTOU, C.; MENON, M. E.; PHILIPPOU, G. Beginning teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of new mathematics curriculum materials. En: REMILLARD, J. T.; HERBEL- EISENMANN, B. A.; LLOYD, G. M. (ed.). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge, 2009. p. 223-244. COHEN, L.; MANION, L.; MORRISON, K. Research methods in education. 6. ed. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. COHEN, D. K. A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Madrid, v. 12, n. 3, p. 327-345, 1990. CORREA, M.; MARÍN, A.; GÓMEZ, P. A.; MESA, Y. M.; VILLA-OCHOA, J. A. Concepciones de formadores de profesores sobre la modelización matemática y la relación con sus prácticas de enseñanza. En: CONFERÊNCIA NACIONAL SOBRE MODELAGEM NA EDUCAÇÃO MATEMÁTICA (CNMEM’05), 9, 2015, São Carlos. Actas... São Carlos: Universidad Federal de Mina Gerais, 2015. COOPER, L. Z. Supporting visual literacy in the school library media center: Development, socio- cultural, and experiential considerations and scenarios. Knowledge Quest: Visual literacy, Chicago, v. 36, n. 3, p. 14-19, 2008. COLLOPY, R. Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, Chicago, v. 103, n. 3, p. 287–311, 2003. DAVENPORT, L. Elementary Mathematics Curricula as a Tool for Mathematics Education Reform: Challenges of Implementation and Implications for Professional Development. Newton: Center for the Development of Teaching, 2000. DEY, A. K.; ABOWD, G. D. Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: GVU Technical Report git-gvu-99-22.Conference: Proceedings of the PrCHI. Schevenin, 2000. p. 304-307. EVEN, R.; TIROSH, D. Teacher knowledge and understanding of students’ mathematical learning and thinking. En: ENGLISH, L. D. (ed.). Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum y NCTM, 2002. p. 219-240. FONT, V.; BREDA, A.; SECKEL, M. J. Algunas implicaciones didácticas derivadas de la complejidad de los objetos matemáticos cuando estos se aplican a distintos contextos. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, Curitiba, v. 10, n. 2, 2017. GELMAN, R.; GALLISTEL, C. R. The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986. GODINO, J. D. Indicadores de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas. En: CONFERÊNCIA INTERAMERICANA DE EDUCAÇÃO MATEMÁTICA (CIAEM-IACME’11), 13., 2011, Recife. Actas... Recife: Universidad Federal de Pernambuco, 2011. p. 1-20. GODINO, J. D. Síntesis del enfoque ontosemiótico del conocimiento y la instrucción matemática: motivación, supuestos y herramientas teóricas. Universidad de Granada. 2014. Disponible en: https://www.ugr.es/~jgodino/eos/sintesis_EOS_24. Acceso: 14 ago. 2010. GODINO, J. D.; BATANERO, C. Significado institucional y personal de los objetos matemáticos. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, Paris, v. 14, n. 3, p. 325-355, 1994. GODINO, J. D.; BATANERO, C.; FONT, V. Fundamentos de la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje de las Matemáticas para maestros. Granada: ReproDigital. Facultad de Ciencias Avda. Granada, 2003. GODINO, J. D.; PINO-FAN, L. Del conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza al conocimiento didáctico-matemático. En: GONZÁLEZ, M. T.; CODES, M.; ARNAU, D.; ORTEGA, T. (ed.). Investigación en Educación Matemática XVIII. Salamanca: SEIEM, 2014. p. 513-522. GODINO, J. D.; BENCOMO, D.; FONT, V.; WILHELMI, M. R. Análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de las matemáticas. Revista Paradigma, Caracas, v. 27, n. 2, p. 1-25, dic. 2006. GRAVEMEIJER, K.; DOORMAN, M. Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, v. 39, n. 1-3, p. 111- 129, 1999. HENRIKSSON, C.; FRIESEN, N. Introduction. En: FRIESEN, N.; HENRIKSSON, C. (ed.). Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Education. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers, 2012. p. 1-14. HILL, H. C.; BALL, D.; SCHILLING, S. Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 39, n. 4, p. 372-400, 2008. KIERAN, C. A procedural-structural perspective on Algebra Research. En: CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (PME), 15., 1991, Assisi. Actas… Assisi: University of Genova, 1991. p. 245-253. v. 2. KIERAN C.; TANGUAY D.; SOLARES, A. Researcher-Designed Resources and Their Adaptation Within Classroom Teaching Practice: Shaping Both the Implicit and the Explicit. En: GUEUDET, G.; PEPIN, B.; TROUCHE, L. (ed.). Mathematics Teacher Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. p. 189-213. v. 7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_10. Acceso: 24 marzo 2005. LLOYD, G. M. School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM Mathematics Education, Berlín, v. 41, p. 763–775, 2009. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0206-4. Acceso: 3 febrero 2010 LLOYD, G. M. Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher’s appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 39, n. 1, p. 63–94, 2008. LLOYD, G. Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Experiences with Innovative Curriculum Materials. En: LEDER, G. C.; PEHKONEN, E.; TÖRNER, G. (ed.). Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?. Dordrecht: Springer, 2002. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_9. Acceso: 15 junio 2008. LLOYD, G. M.; BEHM, S. L Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Analysis of Mathematics Instructional Materials. Action in Teacher Education, London, v. 26, n.4, p.48-62, 2005. DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2005.10463342. LLOYD, G. M.; FRYKHOLM, J. How innovative middle school mathematics materials can change prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions. Education, Chicago, v. 21, p. 575-580, 2000. MARTINEZ, M.; GORGORIÓ, N. Concepciones sobre la enseñanza de la resta: Un estudio en el ámbito de la formación permanente del profesorado. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa (REDIE), Mexicali, v. 6, n. 1, p.389-406, 2004. MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN NACIONAL – MEN 2017. Decreto 1330 de julio 25 de 2019 por el cual se sustituye el Capítulo 2 y se suprime el Capítulo 7 del Título 3 de la arte 5 del Libro 2 del Decreto 1075 de 2015 -Único Reglamentario del Sector Educación, 2019. Disponible en: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-387348.html?_noredirect=1. Acceso en: 35 jun 2020. MOLINA, M.; CASTRO, E.; AMBROSE, R. Trabajo con igualdades numéricas para promover pensamiento relacional. PNA (Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática), Granada, v. 1, n. 1, p. 33-46, 2006. PINO-FAN, L.; GODINO, J. D. Perspectiva ampliada del conocimiento-didáctico matemático del profesor. Revista Paradigma, Caracas, v. 36, n. 1, p. 87-109, jun. 2015. PINO-FAN, L.; ASSIS, A.; CASTRO, W. F. Towards a methodology for the characterization of teachers' didactic-mathematical knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, L, v. 11, n. 6, p. 1429-1456, 2015. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1403ª. PINO-FAN, L.; GODINO, J. D.; FONT, V. Faceta epistémica del conocimiento didáctico-matemático sobre la derivada. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 13, n. 1, p. 141-178, 2011. PINO-FAN, L.; GODINO, J. D.; FONT, V. Una propuesta para el análisis de las prácticas matemáticas de futuros profesores sobre derivadas. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 29, n. 51, p. 60-89, 2015. POCHULU, M.; FONT, V. Análisis del funcionamiento de una clase de matemáticas no significativa. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa (RELIME), Mexico, v. 14, n. 3, p. 361-394, 2011. RABARDEL, P. Les hommes et les technologies: approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin, 1995. p.239. RAMOS, A. B.; FONT, V. Contesto e contestualizzazione nell’insegnamento e nell’apprendimento della matematica: Una prospettiva ontosemiotica. La Matematica e la sua didattica, Bologna, v. 20, n. 4, p. 535-556, 2006. REMILLARD, J. T. Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Elementary School Journal, Chicago, v. 100, n. 4, p. 331–350, 2000. REMILLARD, J. T. Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, Washington, 75, 211–246, 2005. RODRÍGUEZ, D.; VALLDEORIOLA, J. Metodología de la Investigación. Barcelona: UOC – Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 2009. ROGOFF, B. Children´s guided participation and participatory appropriation in socio-cultural activity. En: WOZNIAK, R.; FISHER, K. (ed.). Development in context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993. p. 121-153. SÁNCHEZ, S. Fundamentos para la Investigación Educativa: Presupuestos epistemológicos que orientan al investigador. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio, 1998. SCHLEIGH, S. P.; BOSSÈ, M. J.; LEE, T. Redefining curriculum integration and professional development: In-service teachers as agents of change. Current Issues in Education (CIE), Tempe, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1-14, sep. 2011. SCHOENFELD, A. H. Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, Charlotte, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-94, 1998. SECKEL, M. J.; FONT, V. Competencia reflexiva en formadores del profesorado de matemática. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, Bogotá, v. 12, n. 25, p. 127-144, 2020. DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.m12-25.crfp. SHULMAN, L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, Washington, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4-14, feb. 1986. STOKES, S. Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, Minneapolis, v. 1, n. 1, p. 10–19, 2000. VAN ZOEST, L. R.; BOHL, J. V. The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, New York, v. 5, n. 3, p. 265–288, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019816329185 WIEMERS, N. J. Transformation and accommodation: A case study of Joe Scott. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Washington, v. 12, p. 281-292, 1990. ZHBANOVA, K. S.; RULE, A. C.; MONTGOMERY, S. E.; NIELSEN, L. E. Defining the difference: Comparing integrated and traditional single-subject lessons. Early Childhood Education Journal, New York, v. 38, n. 4, p. 251-258, dec. 2010.