Socio-political aspects of personal experiences in university teacher education programmes
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Hochmuth, Reinhard y Ruge, Johanna.
Resumen
This paper presents and applies the subject-scientific approach to learning, which integrates a socio-political dimension to learning on a theoretical level and provides analytical categories for research. An ongoing qualitative study about learning experiences of pre-service mathematics teachers throughout their university studies is presented. The analytic categories are exemplified by the case of the student Helena. She is splitting her learning in various institutional contexts, which realize different functions in her learning trajectory that could be interpreted in their socio-political dimension within the subject-scientific approach.
Fecha
2015
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Contextos o situaciones | Desarrollo del profesor | Inicial | Sociopolíticos
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Usuario
Título libro actas
Proceedings of the eighth international mathematics education and society conference (volumen 3)
Editores (actas)
Lista de editores (actas)
Greer, Brian y Mukhopadhyay, Swapna
Editorial (actas)
Lugar (actas)
Rango páginas (actas)
925 - 938
Referencias
Dreier, O. (2008). Learning in structures of social practice. In S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, G. Kraft, P. Musaeus, K. Nielsen & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), A qualitative stance: Essays in honor of Steinar Kvale (pp. 85-96). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines. Critical Social Studies, 1(1), 5-32. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan. Holzkamp, K. (2013a). Basic concepts of Critical Psychology. In Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 19-27). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Holzkamp, K. (2013b). Missing the point: Variable psychology’s blindness to the problem’s inherent coherences. In Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 60-74). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Holzkamp, K. (1995). Lernen. Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning—a subject-scientific approach]. Frankfurt/ Main, New York, NY: Campus Verlag. Holzkamp, K. (1985). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundation of psychology]. Frankfurt/Main, New York, NY: Campus Verlag. Langemeyer, I. (2006). Contradictions in Expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 7(1). Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2011). Beyond disavowing the politics of equity and quality in mathematics education. In Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., & Valero, P. (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 35-48). New York, NY: Springer. Roth, W. M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Wernet, A. (2009). Einführung in die Interpretationstechnik der Objektiven Hermeneutik [Introduction to the objective hermeneutics technique of interpretation]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.