The impact of peer instruction on ninth grade students’ trigonometry knowledge

Referencias

ABDELKARIM, R. E.; ABUIYADA, R. The Effect of Peer Teaching on Mathematics Academic Achievement of the Undergraduate Students in Oman. International Education Studies, Ontario, v. 9, n. 5, p. 124-132, April 2016. ABDELKARIM, R.; ABUIYADA, R; SIDDIUI, S. A. Undergraduate Students' Attitude towards Mathematics after Peer Teaching Experience. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, D, v. 12, n. 2, p. 1501-1517, 2016. AKAY, G. The effect of peer instruction method on the 8th grade students’ mathematicsachievement in transformation geometry and attitudes towards mathematics. (Master of Science)– Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, 2011. ALLISON, T. H. The impact of classroom performance system-based instruction with peer instruction upon student achievement and motivation in eighth-grade math students. 2012. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526&context=doctoral. Access in: January 2012 BALTA, N. et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of Peer Instruction on learning gain: Identification of informational and cultural moderators. International Journal of Educational Research, Amsterdam, v. 86, p. 66-77, 2017. BALTA, N.; PERERA-RODRÍGUEZ, V. H.; HERVÁS-GÓMEZ, C. Using socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, New York, v. 23, n. 2, p. 837-850, 2018. BLOYD, E. S. The Effects of Peer Mediated Instruction to Teach Math Skills to Middle School Students. 2015. Thesis (Master of Science in Education) – University of Kentucky, Kentucky, 2015. BRULLES, D.; SAUNDERS, R.; COHN, S. J. Improving performance for gifted students in a cluster grouping model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, California, v. 34, n. 2, p. 327-350, 2010. BÜSCHER, R. et al. Evaluation of the peer teaching program at the University children´ s hospital Essen–a single center experience. GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung, Cologne, v. 30, n. 2, p. 1-20, 2013. CENTER, L. E. Issues of gender and peer collaboration in a problem-solving computer activity. 2004, v.144 [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3135894)]. Rhode Island College, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 2004. CHAPMAN, O. Facilitating Peer Interactions in Learning Mathematics: Teachers’ Practical Knowledge. In: Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 28, 2004, Bergen. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International. Group ... Freudenthal, H.(1973), Mathematics as an educational task, Reidel Publishing ... v. 2, p. 191-198. CORTRIGHT, R. N.; COLLINS, H. L.; DICARLO, S. E. Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems. Advances in physiology education, California, v. 29, n. 2, p. 107-111, 2005. CRONHJORT, M.; FILIPSSON, L.; MARIA, W. Can Peer Instruction in calculus improve student learning? In: International Cdio Conference, 9., 2013, Massachusetts. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013. p. 53-62. CROUCH, C. H.; MAZUR, E. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American journal of physics, Oxfordshire, v. 69, n. 9, p. 970-977, 2001. DEMIREL, F. The effect of using peer instruction in mathematic course on students’ attitude, achievement and retention of knowledge. Thesis (Master of Social Sciences), Ankara, 2013. EBEL, R. L.; FRISBIE, D. A. Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, 1972. FAGEN, A. P.; CROUCH, C. H.; MAZUR, E. Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The physics teacher, Cambridge, v. 40, n. 4, p. 206-209, 2002. FERREIRA, E. P.; NICOLA, S.; FIGUEIREDO, I. Peer Instruction method in introductory Math courses. In: INTERNATIONAL CDIO CONFERENCE, 7., 2011, Copenhagen. Proceedings…, Technical University of Denmark, 2011. p. 104-110. GHOSH, S.; RENNA, F. Technology in Support of Good Pedagogy: Electronic Response Systems and Peer Instruction in an Economics Classroom. 2006. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=888544. Access in: 10 mar. 2006 GIULIODORI, M. J.; LUJAN, H. L.; DICARLO, S. E. Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions. Advances in physiology education, Bethesda, v. 30, n. 4, p. 168-173, 2006. HARWELL, M. Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research: The single-factor, fixed-effects ANCOVA case. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Kansas, v. 28, n. 1, p. 45-70, 2003. JOHNSON, D. W.; JOHNSON, R. T. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Research, Kansas, v. 38, p. 365–379, 2009. KNIGHT, J.; BRAME, C. Peer Instruction. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Bethesda, v. 17, n. 2, p. 1- 4. 2018. KNIGHT, J. K.; WISE, S. B.; SIEKE, S. Group random call can positively affect student in-class clicker discussions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Bethesda, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1-11, 2016. KRATHWOHL, D. R. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, Bethesda, v. 41, n. 4, p. 212-218, 2002. LASRY, N.; MAZUR, E.; WATKINS, J. Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, Melville, v. 76, n. 11, p. 1066-1069, 2008. LUCAS, A. Using peer instruction and i-clickers to enhance student participation in calculus. Problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies, Bethesda, v. 19, n. 3, p. 219-231, 2009. MAZUR, E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1997. MCDONNELL, L.; MULLALLY, M. Research and teaching: Teaching students how to check their work while solving problems in genetics. Journal of College Science Teaching, Arlington, v. 46, p. 68-75, 2016. MILLER, R. L.; SANTANA-VEGA, E.; TERRELL, M. S. Can good questions and peer discussion improve calculus instruction? Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, Bethesda, v. 16, n. 3, p. 193-203, 2006. MORA, G. Peer instruction and lecture tutorials equally improve student learning in introductory geology classes. Journal of Geoscience Education, Bethesda, v. 58, n. 5, p. 286-296, 2010. OLPAK, Y. Z.; BALTACI, S.; ARICAN, M. Investigating the effects of peer instruction on preservice mathematics teachers’ achievements in statistics and probability. Education and Information Technologies, New York, v. 23, n. 6, p. 2323-2340, 2018. PEREZ, K. E.; STRAUSS, E. A.; DOWNEY, N. GALBRAITH, A.; JEANNE, R.; COOPER, S. Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction? CBE-Life Sciences Education, Bethesda, v. 9, n. 2, p. 133-140, 2010. PILZER, S. Peer instruction in physics and mathematics. Problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies, Oxfordshire, v. 11, n. 2, p. 185-192, 2001. PRAHL, K. Best practices for the think-pair-share active-learning technique. The American Biology Teacher, Maryland, v. 79, n. 1, p. 3-8, 2017. QUAIGRAIN, K.; ARHIN, A. K. Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, Oxfordshire, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2017. RAO, S. P.; DICARLO, S. E. Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advances in physiology education, Rockville, v. 24, n. 1, p. 51-55, 2000. RUDNER, L. M.; SCHAFER, W. D. What teachers need to know about assessment. Washington: National Education Association, 2002. Available at:http://echo.edres.org:8080/nea/teachers.pdf. Access in: 01 jul. 2002 SOMASUNDRAM, P.; SYED ZAMRI, S. N. A; LEONG, K. E. Year Five Pupils' Understanding of Relationship Between Addition and Subtraction. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Harrisonburg, v. 1, n. 2, p. 169-180, 2018. TABACHNICK, B. G.; FIDELL, L. S. Using multivariate statistics. 5. ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2007. TAN, S. Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients. Education and Science, Bursa, v. 34, n. 152, p. 101-112, 2009. VASAY, E. T. The effects of peer teaching in the performance of students in mathematics. E- International Scientific Research Journal, Gujarat, v. 2, n. 2, p. 161-171, 2010. VICKREY, T.; ROSPLOCH, K.; RAHMANIAN, R.; PILARZ, M.; STAINS, M. based implementation of peer instruction: A literature review. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Ohio, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2015. YAVUZ, O. C. Effect of peer instruction enriched by the web-based peer and selfself-assessment system on the achievement and attitude of the 7th grade students in rational numbers. Dumlupınar University [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation], Kütahya, Turkey, 2014. ZINGARO, D. Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1. In: ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 45, 2014, New York. Proceedings… New York: ACM Press, 2014. p. 373–378.