The use of a math app to practice counting skills through problem solving and clil

Referencias

Ashburn, E. A., & Floden, R. E. (2006). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. New York: Teachers College Press. Bailey, (2006). A Guide to Qualitative Research. Chapter 9 – Coding, Memoing, and Descriptions. Tammara Sherman EDL 507 Retrieved from: https://appliedinduction.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/chapter-9-coding-memoing-anddescriptions-bailey-2006/ Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51-73. Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Eğitim Yayıncılık. Barringer, M.-D., Pohlman, C., & Robinson, M. (2010). Schools for all kinds of minds: Boosting student success by embracing learning variation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bates, A.W. and Poole, G. (2003) Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass – Retrieved from: http://www.tonybates.ca/2008/07/21/effective-teaching-with-technology-in-highereducation-foundations-for-success/#sthash.joTX1FTP.dpuf Bernard, H. Russell, (2009) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Bitter, G.G., & Pierson, M.E. (2005). Using technology in the classroom. Massachusetts: Pearson. Brosvic, G. M., Dihoff, R. E., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. L. (2006). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. Psychological Record, 56(1), 35. Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & DeGrande, M. (2012). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 184-191. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (Eds.), (pp. 23-48). Cirino, P. T. (2011). The interrelationships of mathematical precursors in kindergarten. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(4), 713e733. Retrieved from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.004. Codding, R. S., Hilt-Panahon, A., Panahon, C. J., & Benson, J. L. (2009). Addressing mathematics computation problems: a review of simple and moderate intensity interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(2), 279e312. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0053 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. (2011). Available at the website of the Common Core State Standards Initiative, Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/. Corzo Zambrano, X. P., & Robles Noriega, H. S. (2011). Approaches to scaffolding in teaching mathematics in English with primary school students in Colombia. Coyle, D (1999) ‘Theory and planning for effective classrooms: supporting students in content and language integrated learning contexts’ in Masih, J (Ed): Learning Through a Foreign Language London: CILL. Crothers, K. (2008). Action Research. Research Starters Education (Online Edition). Cummins, J. (1984) Bilingual Education and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy San Diego: College Hill. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, & pedagogy: Bilingual children caught in the cross-fire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Chang, W.-L., Yuan, Y., Lee, C.-Y., Chen, M.-H., & Huang, W.-G. (2013). Using Magic Board as a teaching aid in third grader learning of area concepts. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 163-173. Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005).The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Parks, CA: Sage. De Smedt, B., Noël, M. P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48e55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001 Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. European commission & Wastiau- Schulter, P. (Ed.) (2005). Key Data on Teaching Languages at school in Europe. Ellis, R. (2001). Focussing on form: Towards a research agenda. In W. Renandya and N. Sunga (Eds). Language curriculum and instruction in multicultural societies (pp. 123-144). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, December, 232-236. Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Themes in education. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from Brown University, The Education Alliance website: http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/themes%5fed/act%5fresearch.pdf Foy, P. and Olson, J.F. (Eds). (2009). TIMSS 2007 International Database and User Guide. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center [online]. Available: http://timss.bc.edu/timss2007/idb_ug.html [4 December, 2012]. Gallegos, B and R Asam: Using Math Apps for Improving Student Learning: An Exploratory Study in an Inclusive Fourth Grade Classroom. March 2015, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 32-39. Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539e1552. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025510. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., & Hamson, C. O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213–239. Gersten, R., and D. Chard. 1999. “Number Sense: Rethinking Arithmetic Instruction for Students with Mathematical Disabilities.” Journal of Special Education 33: 18–28. Geist, E. A. (2012). A qualitative examination of two yearolds interaction with tablet based interactive technology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(1), 26-35. Graddol, D. (2005). Spoken everywhere but at what cost? Guardian Weekly. Retrieved August 03, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2005/apr/20/guardianweekly.guardianweekly11/print Hanushek, E.A. and L.Woessmann, (2008): The role of cognitive skills in economic development, Journal of economic literature 46, 607-68 Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. Hawkes, M., & Cambre, M. (2001). Technology Horizons in Education Journal, 28(1), 26 32. Hidden curriculum (2014, August 26). In S. Abbott (Ed.), the glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum Hiebert, & Kirschner. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (pp. 5- 23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 17-29. Hubbard, P. (Ed.) (2009). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Vol 1 (Critical Concepts in Linguistics). London: Routledge. ICFES, 2010,ICFES Resultados de Colombia en TIMSS 2007 ICFES Evaluaciones Internacionales, Bogotá, DC (2010) Johnson, K.E. (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kelly M.G. (Peggy), & McAnear, A. (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers, preparing teachers to use technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Krashen, S.D. (1997). Why Bilingual Education? ERIC Digest (pp. 4): ERIC/CRESS, P.O. Box 1348, Charleston, WV 25325-1348. Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. (2009). Language Attitudes in CLIL and Traditional EFL Classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (2), 4-17. Lee, J. (2000). Tasks and Communicating in Language Classrooms. Boston: McGrawHill. Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT journal 58.4, 319-326. Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. This is a revised version of a plenary paper presented at the International Conference of the Korean Association for Teachers of English, held in Seoul, Korea, in June 2006. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249. Lynch, T. and Maclean, J. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (Eds.), (pp. 99-118) McTaggert, R. (Ed.). Participatory action research: international contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2010). Estándares básicos de competencias En Lenguaje, Matemáticas, Ciencias y Ciudadanas. Bogotá: MEN. Miller, E and Almon J. (2009). Crisis in the Kindergarten: Why Children Need to Play in School. College Park, Maryland: Alliance for Childhood. Mills, G.E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for mathematics education. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. National Reading Panel. (2000). teaching children to read: An evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National institute of Child Health and Human development. National Center for Educational Achievement. (2009). Core Practices in Math and Science: An Investigation of Consistently Higher Performing Schools in Five States. Austin, TX: National Center for Educational Achievement. Navés, T. and Muñoz, C. (1999) CLIL experiences in Spain. In D. Marsh and G. Langé (eds) Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 145– 157). Finland: Continuing Education Centre, University of Jyväskylä. Novotná, J., Hofmannová, M. and Petrová, J. (2001). Using Games in Teaching Mathematics through a Foreign Language’, in CIEAEM 53, Mathematical Literacy in the Digital Era, Ghisetti e Corvi Editori, pp. 129-131. Nunan, D. (2001). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: CUP. Nunan, D. (2002). English as a global Language. Counting the cost. Features presentation, TESOL International convention, Salt Lake City, March 2002. Nunan, D. (2004). Tasked-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge. Praet, M., Titeca, D., Ceulemans, A., & Desoete, A. (2013). Language in the prediction of arithmetic in kindergarten and grade 1. Learning and Individual Differences, 27(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linidif.2013.07.003.University Press Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York, NY: Grossman Publishers. Ramani, G.B. & Siegler, R.S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(2), 375-394. Ramani, G., Rowe, M.L., *Eason, S., & *Leech, K. (2013, April). Parental talk about math during informal learning activities in Head Start families. Paper presented in G. Ramani (Chair) The role of input and interaction in early numeracy development. The biennial meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA. Resnick, Lauren. 1989. “Developing Mathematical Knowledge.” American Psychologist 44 (2): 162– 169. Richards, Jack C. (2005). Communicative Language Today: Cambridge University Press. Sangarun, J. (2001). The effects of pre-task planning on foreign language performance. Doctoral thesis, University of Toronto, Canada. Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045– 1050. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1045 Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Problematizing the didactical triangle. ZDM, the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 44, 5, 587-599. Seethaler, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). A drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 98–102. Segal, A. (2011). Do gestural interfaces promote thinking? Embodied interaction: Congruent gestures and direct touch promote performance in math. Unpublished dissertation, Columbia University, New York. Smaldino, S., Russell, J., Heinich, R., Molenda, M. (2005). Instructional technology and media for learning (8th Ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall Publishing Company. Savage, R., Carless, S., & Ferraro, V. (2007). Predicting curriculum and test performance at age 11 years from pupil background, baseline skills and phonological awareness at age 5 years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(7), 732–739. http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01746.x ([pii] JCPP1746). Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., & Roberts, G. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005 (NCES 2007-020). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007020.pdf Wiske, M., S., Franz, K. R., & Breit, L. (2005). Teaching for understanding with technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (Chapter 1). Wieczerkowski, A.J. Croplay, T.M. Prado (2000). K.A. Heller, R.J.S.F.J. Monks, R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.), Elsevier, Oxford (2000), pp. 413–425 Yuan, F. and Ellis, R. (2002). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics. Zhou, X. and Wang, B. (2004) Preschool children’s representation of written number symbols, Early Child Development and Care, 173(3), 253–266.