Una ruta didáctica para la enseñanza de los parámetros.

Referencias

Artigue, M. (2002). “Learning Mathematics in a CAS Enviroment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work”. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 7(3), 245 – 274. Artigue, M. (2007). “Tecnología y enseñanza de las matemáticas: desarrollo y aportaciones de la aproximación instrumental”. Historia y perspectiva de la Educación matemática. Memoria de la XII CIAEM, pp 9 – 21. Arzarello, F. (2004). Mathematical landscapesand their inhabits: perceptions, languages, theories.Plenary Lecture delivered at the ICME 10 Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark. July 4-11, 2004. Bloedy-Vinner, H. (1994). “The analgebraic mode of thinking – The case of parameter”, Ponte, J. P. y Matos, J.F. (eds), Proccedings of the Eighteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2. University of Lisbon, Lisbon – Portugal, pp, 82-95. Bloedy-Vinner, H. (2001). “Beyond Unknowns and variables-parameters and dummy variables XIII CIAEM-IACME, Recife, Brasil, 2011. Una ruta didáctica para la enseñanza de los parámetros. 20 in high school algebra”, R. Sutherland et al. (eds.), Perspectives on school Algebra, 177189. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Borba, M; Villareal, M. (2006). Humans – with – Media and the Reorganization of Mathematical Thinking. New York: Springer. D´Amore, B. (2001) Une contribution au débat sur les concepts et les objets mathématiques: la position <<naïve>> dans une théorie <<réaliste>> contre le modèle <<anthropologique>> dans une théorie <<prgamatique>>. En A. Gagatsis (Ed), Learning in Mathematics and Science and Educational Technology. 1, 131-162. Drijvers, P. (2001). The concept of parameter in a computer algebra enviroment. H. Chick et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference. The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra. Vol. 1. The University of Melbourne, Australia, pp, 221-227. Duval, R. (1998). Signe et objet, I et II. Annales de didactique et de sciences cognitives, IREM de Strasburg, 6, 139-196. Filloy, E; Rojano, T. (1984). La aparición del lenguaje Aritmético-Algebraico. L´Educazione Matematica, 5(3), 278-306. Filloy, E. (1999) Aspectos Teóricos del Álgebra Educativa. Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica, México. Filloy, E; Rojano, T.; Puig, L. (2008). Educational Algebra. A theorical and Empirical Approach. Mathematics Education Library. Springer. Gallardo, A. (2002). The extension of the natural-number domain to the integers in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics 49: 171 – 192. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Godino, J.; Batanero, C. (1999). The meaning of mathematical objects as analysis units for didactic of mathematics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First Conference of the European Society for Research Mathematics Education. Guin, D.; Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into a mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 3(3), 195 – 227. Hohenwarter, M & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Aplications. ID 1448, vol. 7. Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra, en K. Hart (ed), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 1116, Murray, London, pp.102-119 Radford, L. (2004). Cose sensibili, essenze, oggetti matematici ed altre ambiguità [Sensible Things, Essences, Mathematical Objects and other ambiguities], La Matematica e la sua didattica. 1, 4-23 Steinbring, H. (2005). Do mathematical Symbols serve to Describe or Construct a “reality”? En M.H.G Hoffmann, J. Lenhard y F. Seeger I (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics Education. New York: Springer, pp.91-104. Vrillon & Rbardel (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education 10(