Using crises, feedback and fading for online task design

Referencias

Anderson, J. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: no magic bullets. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 1-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-149. Bokhove, C. (2008, June). Use of ICT in formative scenarios for algebraic skills. Paper presented at the 4th conference of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands. Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43-49. Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012a). Effects of feedback in an online algebra intervention. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1-2), 43-59. doi:10.1007/s10758-012-9191-8 Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012b). Effects of a digital intervention on the development of algebraic expertise. Computers & Education, 58(1), 197-208. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.010 Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970-1990. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 108-120. De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. Kapur, M (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523-550. Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561-579. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Lagrange, J.-B. (2002). Etudier les mathématiques avec les calculatrices symboliques. Quelle place pour les techniques? [Studying mathematics with symbolic calculators. What role for tehcniques ?] In D. Guin & L. Trouche (Eds.), Calculatrices symboliques. Transformer un outil en un instrument du travail mathématique: un problème didactique [Symbolic calculators. Transforming a tool into an working mathematics instrument: A didactical problem] (pp. 151-185). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts of learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. E. Ripple & V. N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7-20). New York, NY: Cornell University Press. Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out-example principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229-246). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works—A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 59-82. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. The Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69-87. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2009). Bridging the cultures of educational research and design. Educational Designer, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.educationaldesigner.org /ed/volume1/issue2/article5 Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 Tall, D. (1977, February). Cognitive conflict and the learning of mathematics. Paper presented at the First Conference of The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands. from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot1977a-cog-confl-pme.pdf Van Hiele, P. M. V. (1985). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91-111. Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (2012). Task design in mathematics education. Discussion document. Retrieved from http://ncm.gu.se/media/ncm/dokument/ ICMI_Study_22_announcement_and_call_for_papers.pdf