Aportes a la formación de un profesor de matemáticas de la historia cognitiva sobre el pensamiento de Galileo

Referencias

Acerbi, F. (2000). Le fonti del mito platonico di Galileo. Preprint of the Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita` di Roma ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome. Physis, Forthcoming. Altieri Biagi, M. L. (1965). Galileo e la terminologia tecnico-scientifica. Florence: Olschki. Apelt, O. (Ed.). (1888). Aristotelis de plantis, de mirabilibus auscultationibus, mechanica, de lineis insecabilibus, ventorum situs et nomina, de Melisso Xenophane Gorgia. Leipzig: Teubner. Archimedes (1544). Archimedis syracusani philosophi ac geometrae excellentissimi Opera. Basileae: Ioannes Hervagius. Aristotle. (1982). MHXANIKA. Tradizione manoscritta, testo critico e scolii (M. E. Bottecchia, Ed.). Padova: Antenore. Bonatti, L. (1994a). Propostional reasoning by model? Psychological Review, 101, 725– 733. Bonatti, L. (1994b). Why should we abandon the mental logic hypothesis? Cognition, 50, 17–39. Brown, J. R. (1991). Thought experiments: A Platonic account. In T. Horovitz, & G. J. Massey (Eds.), Thoughts experiments in science and philosophy (pp. 119–128). Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. Brown, J. R. (1999). Philosophy of mathematics. An introduction to the world of proofs and pictures. London and New York: Routledge. Budden, T. (1998). Galileo’s ship thought experiment and relativity principles. Endeavour, 22, 54–56. Clavelin, M. (1996). La philosophie naturelle de Galile´e. Paris: Albin Michel. First published 1968. Clavius, C. (1611–1612). Christophori Clauii Bambergensis e Societate Iesu opera mathematica V tomis distributa. Ab auctore nunc denuo correcta et plurimis locis aucta (5 vols.). Mainz: Sumptibus Antonij Hierat excudebat Reinhard Eltz. Clavius, C. (1999). Commentaria in Euclidis elementa geometrica. Hildesheim: Olms Weidmann. Facsimile edition of the commentary on Euclid in the first volume of Clavius 1611– 1612. Cummins, R. (1991). Meaning and mental representation. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press. Cummins, R. (1995). Connectionism and the rationale constraint on cognitive explanation. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 105–125. Cummins, R. (1996). Representations, targets, and attitudes. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press. De Ceglia, F. P. (2000). Giorgio Coresio: Note in merito a un difensore dell’opinione di Aristotele. Physis, 37, 393–437. De Gandt, F. (1995). Force and geometry in Newton’s Principia (Curtis Wilson, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. 262 P. Palmieri / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 34 (2003) 229–264 De Groot, J. (2000). Aspects of Aristotelian statics in Galileo’s dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31A, 645–664. Del Monte, G. U. (1589). In duos Archimedis aequeponderantium libros: Paraphrasis scholiis illustrata. Pesaro: Apud Hieronymum Concordiam. Di Girolamo, G. (1999). L’ influenza Archimedea nei ‘Theoremata’ di Galilei. Physis, 36, 21–54. Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1987). Archimedes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. First published 1956. Drake, S. (1970). Galileo studies: Personality, tradition and revolution. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Drake, S. (1973). Velocity and Eudoxian proportion theory. Physis, 15, 49–64. Drake, S. (1974a). Galileo’s work on free fall in 1604. Physis, 16, 309–322. Drake, S. (1974b). Mathematics and discovery in Galileo’s physics. Historia Mathematica, 1, 129–150. Drake, S. (1987). Euclid Book V from Eudoxus to Dedekind. Cahiers d’ histoire et de philosophie des sciences, n.s. 21, 52–64. Reprinted in S. Drake (1999), Essays on Galileo and the history and philosophy of science (3 vols.) (III, pp. 61–75). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Euclid (1956). The thirteen books of the Elements (T. Heath, Trans. with an introduction and commentary) (2nd ed.) (3 vols.). New York: Dover Publications. Favaro, A. (1886). La libreria di Galileo Galilei. Bollettino di bibliografia e di storia delle scienze matematiche e fisiche, 19, 219–290. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press. Galilei, G. (1890–1909). Le opere di Galileo Galilei (Edizione nazionale) (A. Favaro, Ed.) (20 vols.). Florence: Barbera. Galilei, G. (1960). In S. Drake, & I. E. Drabkin (Eds.), On motion and on mechanics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. Galilei, G. (1974). In S. Drake (Ed.), Two new sciences: Including centres of gravity and force of percussion. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. Galilei, G. (1990). In E. Giusti (Ed.), Dicorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze attinenti alla meccanica ed i movimenti locali. Turin: Einaudi. Galluzzi, P. (1976). A proposito di un errore dei traduttori di Vitruvio nel ’500. Annali dell’ Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze, 1, 71–88. Galluzzi, P. (1979). Momento: Studi galileiani. Rome: Edizioni dell’ Ateneo & Bizzarri. Gendler, T. S. (1998). Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. The British Journal for the Philsophy of Science, 49, 397–424. Gendler, T. S. (2000). Thought experiment: On the powers and limits of imaginary cases. New York and London: Garland Publishing. Geymonat, L., & Carugo, A. (1981). I cosiddetti esperimenti mentali nei Discorsi Galileiani e i loro legami con la tecnica. In L. Geymonat (Ed.), Per Galileo (pp. 81–98). Verona: Bertani Editore. Giusti, E. (1986). Ricerche Galileiane: Il trattato ‘De motu equabili’ come modello della teoria delle proporzioni. Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche, 6, 89–108. Giusti, E. (1992). La teoria galileiana delle proporzioni. In L. Conti (Ed.), La matematizzazione dell’ universo (pp. 207–222). Perugia: Edizioni Porziuncola. Giusti, E. (1993). Euclides reformatus: La teoria delle proporzioni nella scuola galileiana. Turin: Bollati-Boringhieri. Giusti, E. (1994). Il filosofo geometra. Matematica e filosofia naturale in Galileo. Nuncius, 9, 485–498. Giusti, E. (2001). Los discursos sobre dos nuevas ciencias. In J. L. Montesinos (Ed.), Galileo y la gestación de la ciencia moderna (pp. 245–266). La Orotava, Canary Islands: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia. Glasgow, J., & Malton, A. (1999). A semantics for model-based spatial reasoning. In G. Rickheit, & C. Habel (Eds.), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Goe, G. (1972). Archimedes’ theory of the lever and Mach’s critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 329–345. Goldward, E., & Johnson-Laird, N. P. (2001). Naı¨ve causality: a mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565–610. P. Palmieri / Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 34 (2003) 229–264 263 Grattan-Guinness, I. (1996). Numbers, magnitudes, ratios, and proportions in Euclid’s Elements: How did he handle them? Historia Mathematica, 23, 355–375. Guarino, A. (1573). Le mechanice d’ Aristotele trasportate di greco in volgare idioma: Con le sue dechiarationi nel fine, con l’ ordine de numeri de capitoli, in particolar volume da se. Modena: Andrea Gadalino. Irvine, A. D. (1991). On the nature of thought experiments in scientific reasoning. In T. Horovitz, & G.J. Massey (Eds.), Thoughts experiments in science and philosophy (pp. 149–166). Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). Images, models and propositional representations. In M. de Vega (Ed.), Models of visuo-spatial cognition (pp. 90–127). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Johnson-Laird, N. P., & Byrne, R. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Johnson-Laird, N. P., & Byrne, R. (2000). Mental models website http://www.tcd.ie/Psychology/RuthFByrne/mentalFmodels/index.html. Koyré, A. (1943). Galileo and Plato. Journal of the History of Ideas, 4, 400–428. Koyré, A. (1973). É tudes d’ histoire de la pensée scientifique. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. First published 1966. Koyré, A. (1978). Galileo studies (J. Mepham, trans.). Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press Limited. First published 1939. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). In A function for thought experiments. The essential tension (pp. 240–265). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Laymon, R. (1991). Thought experiments of Stevin Mach and Gouy: Thought experiments as ideal limits and as semantic domains. In T. Horovitz, & G. J. Massey (Eds.), Thoughts experiments in science and philosophy (pp. 167–192). Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc. Lennox, J. J. (1986). Aristotle, Galileo, and ‘mixed sciences’. In W. Wallace (Ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo (pp. 29–52). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press. Leonico Tomeo, N. (1530). Opuscula. Paris: Apud Simonem Colinaeum. Mach, E. (1989). The science of mechanics (6th ed.) (T. J. McKormach, Trans.). La Salle: Open Court. Machamer, P. (1998). Galileo’s machines, his experiments, and his mathematics. In P. Machamer (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Galileo (pp. 53–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mazzoni, J. (1597). In universam Platonis, et Aristotelis philosophiam praeludia, sive de comparatione Platonis, et Aristotelis. Venice: Apud Ioannem Guerilium. McAllister, J. W. (1996). The evidential significance of thought experiment in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27, 233–250. Micheli, G. (1991). Le Questioni meccaniche e Galileo. In P. Casini (Ed.), Alle origini della rivoluzione scientifica (pp. 69–89). Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press. Millikan, R. G. (1993). White Queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press. Millikan, R. G. (2001). The language–thought partnership: A bird’s eye view. Language & Communication, 21, 157–166. Miščević, N. (1992). Mental models and thought experiments. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 6, 215–226. Netz, Reviel (1999). The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Norton, J. (1991). Thought experiments in Einstein’s work. In T. Horovitz, & G. J. Massey (Eds.), Thoughts experiments in science and philosophy (pp. 129–148). Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc. Norton, J. (1996). Are thought experiments just what you thought? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 333–366. Palladino, F. (1991). La teoria delle proporzioni nel Seicento. Nuncius, 6, 33–81. Palmieri, P. (2001). The obscurity of the equimultiples. Clavius’ and Galileo’s foundational studies of Euclid’s theory of proportions. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 55, 555–597. Pappus (1588). Federici Commandini mathematici celeberrimi exactissima commentaria in libros octo Mathematicarum Collectionum Pappi Alexandrini e graeco in latinum a se accuratissime conversos. Pesaro: Apud Hieronimum Concordiam. Piccolomini, A. (1547). In mechanicas quaestiones Aristotelis, paraphrasis paulo quidem plenior. Rome: Apud Antonium Bladum Asulanum. Prudovsky, G. (1989). The confirmation of the superposition principle: On the role of a constructive thought experiment in Galileo’s Discorsi. Studies in History and Philsophy of Science, 20, 453–468. Purnell, F. (1972). Jacopo Mazzoni and Galileo. Physis, 14, 273–294. Remmert, V. R. (1998). Ariadnefa¨den im Wissenschaftslabyrinth: Stiudien zu Galilei: Historiographie – Mathematik – Wirkung. Bern: Lang. Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). Imagery. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press. Rider, R. E. (1993). Early modern mathematics in print. In G. Mazzolini (Ed.), Non verbal communication in science prior to 1900 (pp. 91–113). Florence: Leo S. Olschki. Roche, J. J. (1993). The semantics of graphics in mathematical natural philsophy. In G. Mazzolini (Ed.), Non-verbal communication in science prior to 1900 (pp. 197–233). Florence: Leo S. Olschki. Rose, P. L. (1975). The Italian renaissance of mathematics. Studies on humanists and mathematicians from Petrarch to Galileo. Gene`ve: Librarie Droz. Rose, P. L., & Drake, S. (1971). The pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in Renaissance culture. Studies in the Renaissance, 18, 65–104. Saito, K. (1986). Compounded ratio in Euclid and Apollonius. Historia Scientiarum, 31, 25–59. Sasaki, C. (1985). The acceptance of the theory of proportions in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Historia Scientarum, 29, 83–116. Saito, K. (1993). Duplicate ratio in Book VI of Euclid’s Elements. Historia Scientiarum, 50, 115–135. Schmitt, C. (1972). The faculty of arts at Pisa at the time of Galileo. Physis, 14, 243–272. Shea, W. R. (1972). Galileo’s intellectual revoution. New York: Science History Publications. Sorensen, T. A. (1992). Thought experiments. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sylla, E. (1984). Compounding ratios: Bradwardine, Oresme, and the first edition of Newton’s Principia. In E. Mendelsohn (Ed.), Transformation and tradition in the sciences: Essays in honor of I. Bernard Cohen (pp. 11–43). Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Turner, Mark (2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Van der Henst, J. B. (1999). The mental model theory of spatial reasoning re-examined: The role of relevance in premise order. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 73–84. Ventrice, P. (1989). La discussione sulle maree tra astronomia, meccanica e filosofia nella cultura venetopadovana del Cinquecento. Venice: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Wallace, W. (2000). Dialectics, experiments, and mathematics in Galileo. In P. Machamer, M. Pera, & A. Baltas (Eds.), Scientific controversies (pp. 100–124). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wisan, W. (1974). The new science of motion: A study of Galileo’s De motu locali. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13, 102–306.