Crafting cultural intelligence in school mathematics curricula: a paradigm shift in Nepali school education

Referencias

Ang, S., Dyne, L. V., Koh, C., Yee Ng, K., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision-making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335-371. Ascher, M. (2002). Mathematics elsewhere: an exploration of ideas across cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Boner, A. (1990). Principles of composition in Hindu sculpture: cave temple period. New Delhi, India: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. Chakrabarty, S., & Mohamed, N. (2013). Problem based learning: cultural diverse students’ engagement, learning and contextualized problem solving in a mathematics class. WCIK e-Journal of Integration Knowledge, 38-49. Retrieved from http://worldconferences.net/journals/wcik/paperwcik/WCIK%20030%20sheila%20chak rabarty.pdf. Confrey, J., & Kazak, S. (2006). A Thirty-year reflection on constructivism in mathematics education. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.). Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present and future (pp. 367-402). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing. D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44-48. D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is ethnomathematics and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308-312. D’Ambrosio, U. (2007). Peace, social justice, and ethnomathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, 25-34. D’Ambrosio, U. (2010). Ethnomathematics: a response to the changing role of mathematics in society. Campinas, SP: UNICAMP. D’Ambrosio, U, (2012). O programa etnomatemática, história, metodologia e pedagogia [Ethnomathematics program, history, methodology, and pedagogy]. Retrieved from http://api.ning.com/files/pRaYTPLYsB*irpa6k4lIW0aT6Z3mhPHcDu05TW08RQAxk gm4sPeEHKKNm3FrY7Wa8Ajz2RyicWAbi81VKcbFAO5cnTFTGC/Oprogramaetno matemtica.pdf. D’Ambrosio, U., & Rosa, M. (2008). A dialogue with Ubiratan D’Ambrosio: a Brazilian conversation about ethnomathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 1(2), 88-110. Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Fien, J. (2010). Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_c/mod11.html. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY: Basic Book. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Godfrey, R. (2011). Non-biological intelligence. The Burgundy Blog. Retrieved from http://www.spiderbomb.com/blog/?p=8. Godin, S. (2014). Stop stealing dreams: what is school for? E.book. Retrieved from http://www.sethgodin.com/sg/docs/stopstealingdreamsscreen.pdf. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York, NY: Routledge. Hampton, E. (1995). Towards a redefinition of Indian education. In M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds). First Nations education in Canada: the circle unfolds (pp. 5-46). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. Harding-DeKam, J. L. (2014). Defining culturally responsive teaching: The case of mathematics. Greeley, CO: Cogent Education. Hart L. E. (2003). Some directions for research on equity and justice in mathematics education. In L. Burton (Eds.). Which way social justice in mathematics education? International Perspectives on Mathematics Education (pp.25-50). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. Irvine, J. J., & Armento, B. J. (2001). Culturally responsive teaching: lesson planning for elementary and middle grades. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Jacobs, H. H. (2011).TED on curriculum. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsUgj9_ltN8. Jha, K., Adhikary, P. R., & Pant, S. R. (2006). A history of mathematical sciences in Nepal. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 2(1), 1-6. Jayaram, V. (2009). Symbolic significance of numbers in Hinduism. Retrieved from http://www.hinduwebsite.com/numbers.asp. Kramrisch, S. (1976). The Hindu temple. Volume 1. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. Livermore, D. (2011). The cultural intelligence (CQ) difference. TED Talk. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2C7Mfft9OY . Luitel, B. C. (2009). Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: a cultural-philosophical inquiry. Doctorate Thesis. School of Education. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology. Luitel, B. C. (2013). Mathematics as an im/pure knowledge system: symbiosis, (w)holism and synergy in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-23. Luitel, B. C, & Taylor, P. C. (2007). Theshanai, the pseudosphere and other imaginings: envisioning culturally contextualised mathematics education Cultural Studies of Science Education 2(3), 621-638. Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Meyer, K. (2010). ‘Diving into reading’: revisiting reciprocal teaching in the middle years. Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, 18(1), 41–52. Michell, G. (1988). The Hindu temple: an introduction to its meaning and forms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Molina, A. C. (2013). Romanticizing culture: the role of teachers’ cultural intelligence in working with diversity. The Catesol Journal, 24(1), 220-244. Retrieved from http://www.catesoljournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/cj24_molina.pdf. Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. Naveira, M. A. C. (2005). A cultura como identidade: reflexões indígenas sobre um velho conceito antropológico. Paper presented at XXIX Encontro Anual da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. Florianópolis, SC: ANPOCS. Neupane, R. (2012). Journey from Euclideananism to Post/Euclidean. Unpublished master dissertation. School of Education. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu University. Neupane, R. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematics in a cultural context: ping as a project. Paper accepted for presentation at TSG35 - Role of Ethnomathematics in Mathematics Education at ICME13. Hamburg, Germany: ICME13. Nguyen, P. M., Elliott, J. G., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2009). Neocolonialism in education: cooperative learning in an Asian context. Comparative Education, 45(1), 109–130. O’Neill, T. A., & Jelley, R. B. (2014). Integrating practical experience in I-O courses. The Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 52(1), 142-153. Parker, S. (2010). Ritual as a mode of production: ethnoarchaeology and creative practice in Hindu temple arts. South Asian Studies, 26(1), 31-57. Ravitz, N. H., Hixson, N., English, M., & Mergendoller, J. (2012). Using project-based learning to teach 21st century skills: findings from a statewide initiative. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada: AERA. Rosa, M. (2010). A mixed-method study to understand the perceptions of high school leaders about English Language Learners (ELLs): the case of mathematics. College of Education. Doctorate Thesis. Sacramento, CA: California State University. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2007). POP: A study of the ethnomathematics of globalization using the sacred Mayan aat pattern. In B. Atweb, A. C. Barton, M. C. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu; R. Vithal (Orgs.). Internacionalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 227-236). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics: the cultural aspects of mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatematica, 4(2), 32-54. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2013). Ethnomathematics: connecting cultural aspects of mathematics through culturally relevant pedagogy. Mathematics Education & Society, 8(3), 887-897. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2105a). Evidence of creative insubordination in the research of pedagogical action of ethnomathematics program. In B. S. D’Ambrosio & C. E. Lopes (Eds.). Creative insubordination in Brazilian mathematics education research (pp. 133-145). Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015b). A trivium curriculum for mathematics based on literacy, matheracy, and technoracy: an ethnomathematics perspective. ZDM, 47(4), 587-598. Sardar, Z. 1999. Development and the locations of Eurocentricism. In R. Munck & D. O’Hearn (Eds.). Critical development theory (pp. 44–62). London, England: Zed. Sharma, T. (2012). Becoming a ‘good’ mathematics teacher: an epic journey through different mathematical terrains. Unpublished master dissertation. School of Education. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kathmandu University. Sharma, T., & Neupane, R. (2014). Present context of Nepalese mathematics education and critical mathematics education. Second National Conference in Mathematics Education. Pokhara, Nepal: Teachers College Press. Srinivasan, N. R. (2012). What do the odd and even numbers in Cahamakam signify? Retrieved from http://nrsrini.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-do-odd-and-even-numbersin.html. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.