Design and research for developing local instruction theories

Referencias

Artigue, M. (2009). Didactical design in mathematics education. In C. Winslow (Ed.), Proceedings from NORMA08 in Copenhagen (pp. 7-16). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education. A practical guide for early career researchers. New York: Routledge. Bakker, A., Doorman, M., & Drijvers, P. (2003). Design research on how IT may support the development of symbols and meaning in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen (ORD). Kerkrade, Netherlands. De Beer, H., Gravemeijer, K., & van Eijck, M. (2018) Exploring instantaneous speed in fifth grade. Educational Designer, 3(10), 1-27. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2-33. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition theory: Social, semiotic, and neurological perspectives (pp. 151-233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2-33. De Lange, J., Burrill, G., Romberg, T., & van Reeuwijk, M. (1993). Learning and testing mathematics in context. The case: Data visualization. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education. DiSessa, A.A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: meta- representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117-160. Doorman, L. M., & van Maanen, J. A. (2008). A historical perspective on teaching and learning calculus. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 22(2), 4-14. Doorman, L. M., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2009). Emergent modeling: Discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 41(1), 199-211. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company. Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Educational development and developmental research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443-471. Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1998). Developmental research as a research method. In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (An ICMI Study) (Vol. 2, pp. 277-295). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Doorman, L. M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 111-129. Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225-273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gravemeijer, K., van Galen, F., & Keijzer, R. (2005). Designing instruction on proportional reasoning with average speed. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 103-108). Melbourne, Australia: PME. Meira, L. (1995). Microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activity. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 269-313. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiments methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1988). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction –The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel. Van Oers, B. (2000). The appropriation of mathematics symbols: A psychosemiotic approach to mathematics learning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Perspectivies on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 133-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in Realistic Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54(1), 9-35.