Explorando una consecuencia de la comprensión matemática

Referencias

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). The Design of Learning Environments. En J. D. Bramsford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), How People Learn: Brain,Mind,Experience,and School (119-142).Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press. Explorando una consecuencia de la comprensión matemática Comunicación XIV CIAEM-IACME, Chiapas, México, 2015. 12 Duval, R. (1992). Gráficas y Ecuaciones: la articulación de dos registros. En Antología en Educación Matemática (pp. 125-139). México: CINVESTAV. Duval, R. (1999). Semiosis y Pensamiento Humano. Registros semióticos y aprendizajes intelectuales. Universidad del Valle y Peter Lang S. A. (Trad. Myriam Vega Restrepo). Santiago de Cali, Colombia. Ellis, M. (2003). Constructing a Personal Understanding of Mathematics: Making the Pieces Fit. Mathematics Teacher, 6(8). Eraslan, A., & Aspinwall, L. (2007). Quadratic Functions: Students’ Graphic and Analytic Representations. Mathematics Teacher, 101(3). Hartter, B.J. (2009). A Function or Not a Function. That Is the Question. Mathematics Teacher, 103(3), 201-205. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and Teaching With Understanding. En D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Janvier, C. (Ed.). (1987). Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Knuth, E. J. (2000). Student Understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An Exploratory Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31 (4), 500-508. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60 (1), 1-64. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Students' use of the X-Intercept as an Instance of a Transitional Conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics 37, 169-197. Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A.H., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of Undertanding: On Multiple Perspectives and Representations of Linear Relations and Connections Among Them. En A. Romberg, E. Fenema & T. A. Carpenter, (Eds.), Integrating Research on the Graphical Representation of funtions (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM. Pilipczuk, C. (2008). Graphing Functions. Resolving Students’ Misconceptions by Using “Messy” Data and Calculator-Based Laboratory Activities. Mathematics Teacher, 101(9). Rivera, F. (2007). Visualizing as a Mathematical Way of Knowing: Understanding Figural Generalization. Mathematics Teacher, 101(1). Romberg, T. A., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (Eds.). (1993). Integrating Research on the Graphical Representation of Functions. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Methacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics. En D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.334-370). New York: MacMillan Pu. Co. Sinclair, N., & Alayne, A. (2011). Tell a Piecewise Story. Matematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(6), 347-353. You, Z. (2009). How Students Interpret Graphs. Matematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(4), 188- 190.