Habilidades de visualización dinámica tridimensional: el caso de los lugares geométricos 3D

Referencias

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077 Bakker, A. (2018). What is design research in education? In Design Research in Education. A practical guide for early career researchers (1st ed., pp. 3–23). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010 Bakker, A. & van Eerde, D. (2015). An Introduction to Design-Based Research with an Example From Statistics Education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (Issue Chapter 16, pp. 429–466). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 017-9181-6 Boz, N. (2005). Dynamic visualization and software environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1), 26–32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102654.pdf Bruce, C., Davis, B., Sinclair, N., McGarvey, L., Hallowell, D., Drefs, M., Francis, K., Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Mulligan, J., Okamoto, Y., Whiteley, W. & Woolcott, G. (2017). Understanding gaps in research networks: using “spatial reasoning” as a window into the importance of networked educational research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9743-2 Budai, L. (2013). Improving Problem-Solving Skills with the Help of Plane-Space Analogies. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(4), 79–98. Cobb, P., Jackson, K. & Dunlap, C. (2017). Conducting Design Studies to Investigate and Support Mathematics Students’ and Teachers’ Learning. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 208–233). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, NCTM. Eisenberg, T. & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics (pp. 25–37). Mathematical Association of America Service Center. MAA Notes Number 19. Fernández-Mosquera, E. (2011). Situaciones para la enseñanza de las cónicas como lugar geométrico desde lo puntual y lo global integrando Cabri Géomètre II Plus [Universidad del Valle]. In Tesis de Maestría. http://bibliotecadigital.univalle.edu.co/handle/10893/3901 Ferrara, F. & Mammana, M. F. (2014). Seeing in space is dificult: an approach to 3D geometry through a DGE. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, 3, 57–64. http://www.pme38.com/ García-Dominguez, M., Martin-Gutierrez, J., Roca-Gonzalez, C. & Mato-Corredeaguas, C. (2012). Methodologies and Tools to Improve Spatial Ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.233 Gómez-Chacón, I. M., Botana, F., Escribano, J. & Abánades, M. (2016). Concepto de lugar geométrico. Génesis de utilización personal y profesional con distintas herramientas. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 30(54), 67–94. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n54a04 Gómez-Chacón, I. M. & Escribano, J. (2014). Geometric Locus activities in a dynamic geometry system. Noniconic visualization and instrumental genesis. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, RELIME, 17(4–2), 361–383. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33554784008 Gutiérrez, Á. & Jaime, A. (2015). Análisis del aprendizaje de geometría espacial en un entorno de geometría dinámica 3-dimensional. PNA, 9(2), 53–83. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/34155 Hitt, F. (1998). Visualización matemática, representaciones, nuevas tecnologías y curriculum. Educación Matemática, 10(2), 23–45. http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/10137/1/Visualizacion1998Hitt.pdf Jahn, A. P. (2000). New tools, new attitudes to knowledge: the case of geometric loci and transformations in dynamic geometry environments. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima, Japan (Vol. 1, pp. 91– 102). Hiroshima University and PME. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452031.pdf#page=126 Jahn, A. P. (2002). “Locus” and “Trace” in Cabri géomètre: Relationships between geometric and functional aspects in a study of transformations. ZDM, Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, International Journal on Mathematics Education, 34(3), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655710 Jones, K., Maschietto, M., Mithalal, J. & Papadaki, C. (2019). Introduction to the papers of TWG04: Geometry Teaching and Learning. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, CERME 11, 1–4. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02402091/ Jones, K. & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In Á. Gutiérrez, G. Leder & P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: The Journey Continues (pp. 109–149). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4 Kepceoğlu, İ. (2018). Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software on 3-Dimensional Geometric Shape Drawing Skills. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(10), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i10.3197 Kösa, T. (2016a). Effects of using dynamic mathematics software on pre-service mathematics teachers spatial visualization skills: The case of spatial analytic geometry. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 449– 458. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2686 Kösa, T. (2016b). The Effect of Using Dynamic Mathematics Software: Cross Section and Visualization. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 24(4), 121–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1564/tme Kösa, T. & Karakuş, F. (2010). Using dynamic geometry software Cabri 3D for teaching analytic geometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1385–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.204 Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K. & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and Learning Geometry with Technology. In Á. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, present and future (Vol. 1, pp. 275–304). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_011 Mammana, M. F. (2019). The Modernity of the Meraner Lehrplan for Teaching Geometry Today in Grades 10–11: Exploiting the Power of Dynamic Geometry Systems. In H.-G. Weigand, W. McCallum, M. Menghini, M. Neubrand & G. Schubring (Eds.), The Legacy of Felix Klein, ICME-13 Monographs (1st ed., pp. 153–166). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99386-7 Mammana, M. F., Micale, B. & Pennisi, M. (2012). Analogy and dynamic geometry system used to introduce threedimensional geometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 818–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.662286 Mariotti, M. A. & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2018). Developing the Mathematical Eye Through Problem-Solving in a Dynamic Geometry Environment. In N. Amado, S. Carreira & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the Scope of Research on Mathematical Problem Solving. A Focus on Technology, Creativity and Affect. Research in Mathematics Education Series. (pp. 153–176). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-99861-9_7 Morrow, J. (1997). What is Dynamic Visualization? In Geometry turned on! Dynamic software in learning, teaching and research (pp. 47–54). The Mathematical Association of America. Nagy-Kondor, R. (2017). Spatial Ability: Measurement and Development. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial Ability in STEM Education: Transforming Research into Practice (pp. 35–58). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0 Ng, O. L. & Ferrara, F. (2020). Towards a Materialist Vision of ‘Learning as Making’: the Case of 3D Printing Pens in School Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10000-9 Pittalis, M. & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9251-8 Polya, G. (1989). Como plantear y resolver problemas. In J. Zugazagoitia (Trans.), Serie de Matemáticas (15th ed.). Trillas. Presmeg, N. (2020). Visualization and Learning in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 900–904). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_161 Schumann, H. (2003). Computer aided treatment of 3dproblems in analytic geometry. ZDM, Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, International Journal on Mathematics Education, 35(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652760 Schweiger, F. (2006). Fundamental Ideas: A Bridge Between Mathematics and Mathematical Education. In J. Maasz & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), New Mathematics Education Research and Practice (pp. 51–62). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903510 Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. Sinclair, N., Bartolini-Bussi, M. G., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A. & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM, Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48(5), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6 Vallo, D. & Zahorska, J. (2016). Geometry software cabri 3D in teaching stereometry. 2016 IEEE 10th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT) Conference Proceedings, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2016.7991805 Villarreal, M. (2003). La investigación en educación matemática: ¿qué ocurre en Argentina? Premisa, 16(December), 4–12. http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/23155/