Implementación de la metodología de instrucción por pares en un curso de cálculo

Referencias

Epstein, J. (2007). Development and validation of the calculus concept inventory. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Math. Ed. in a Global Community, vol. 9, Charlotte, NC, pp. 165-170. Good Questions Project, Cornell University. Retrieved from: http://www.math.cornell.edu/ GoodQues- tions/materials.html Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys., 66(1), pp. 64-74. Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. Am. J. Phys., 53(11), pp. 1043-1048. Hestenes, D. Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, vol. 30, pp. 141-158. James, M. C. (2006). The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in peer instruction. Am. J. Phys., 74(8), pp. 689-691. James, M. C., Barbieri, F. & and Garcia, P. (2008). What are they talking about? Lessons learned from a study of peer instruction. Astron. Educ. Rev., 7(1), p. 37. Judson, E. & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach., vol. 21, pp. 167-181. Lucas, A. (2009). Using peer instruction and I-clickers to enhance student participation in calculus. Prob- lems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, vol. 19, issue 3, pp. 219-231. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user´s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Miller, R. L., Santana-Vega, E. & Terrell, M. S. (2006). Can good questions and peer discussion improve calculus instruction. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, vol. 16, number 3, pp. 193-203. Turpen, C. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). The construction of different classroom norms during peer instruction: Students perceive differences. Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research, vol. 6, number 2, 020123