La enseñanza de la función logarítmica como inversa de la función exponencial: un estudio de caso

Referencias

Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Roa-Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M. y Weller, K. (2014). APOS Theory. A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. Attorps, I., Björk, K., Radic, M. y Viirman, O. (2013). Teaching inverse functions at tertiary level. En: Ubuz, B., Haser, Ç. y Mariotti, M. A. (eds.). Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2524-2533). Middle East Technical University y ERME. Bayacit, I. y Gray, E. (2004) Understanding inverse functions: The relationship between teaching practice and student learning. En: Honies, M. J. y Fuglestad, A. B. (eds.). Proceedings of 28th Conference of the Inter-national Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 103-110). PME. Breen, S., Larson, N., O’Shea, A. y Pettersson, K. (2015). Students’ concept images of inverse functions. En: Krainer, K. y Vondrová, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2228-2234). ERME. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J. y Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 247-285. Brown, C. A. y Reynolds, B. (2007). Delineating four conceptions of function: A case of composition and inverse. En: Lamberg, E. y Wiest, L. R. (eds.). Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 190-193). University of Nevada. Carlson, M. y Oehrtman, M. (2005). Research Sampler, 9. Key aspects of knowing and learning the concept of function. Mathematical Association of America. Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M. y Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understanding. Cognition and Understanding, 28(2), 113-145. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K. y Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal for Mathematical Behaviour, 15(2), 167-192. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. En: Tall, D. (ed.). Ad-vanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 9523). Kluwer Academic. Dubinsky, E. (1996). Aplicación de la perspectiva piagetiana a la educación matemática universitaria. Educación Matemática, 8(3), 24-41. Dubinsky, E. y McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergrad mathematics education research. En: Holton, D. (ed.). The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI Study (pp. 273-280). Kluwer Academic. Even, R. (1992) The inverse function: Prospective teachers’ use of «undoing». International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 23(4), 557-562. García, M., Gavilán, J. M. y Llinares, S. (2012). Perspectiva de la práctica del profesor de matemáticas de secundaria sobre la enseñanza de la derivada. Relaciones entre la práctica y la perspectiva del profesor. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(3), 219-235. González, M. T. y Portugal, R. (2018) La práctica docente del profesor: la enseñanza de fracciones en un aula de primaria a través de situaciones-problema. Educatio Siglo XXI, 36(3), 177-200. https://doi. org/10.6018/j/349961 Hersant, M. y Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (2005). Characterization of an ordinary teaching practice with the help of the Theory of Didactics Situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1-3), 113-151. Kimani, P. M. y Masingila, J. O. (2006). Calculus students’ perceptions of the relationship among the con-cepts of function transformation, function composition, and function inverse. En: Alatorre, S., Cortina, J. L., Sáiz, M. y Méndez, A. (eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology or Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 68-70). Universidad Pe-dagógica Nacional. Llinares, S. (2000). Comprendiendo la práctica del profesor de matemáticas. En: Da Ponte, J. P. y Sarrazi-na, L. (eds.). Educaçao Matemática em Portugal, Espanha e Italia Lisboa. Actas da Escola de Verao-1999 (pp. 109-132). SEM-SPCE. Llinares, S. (2013) Professional noticing: A component of mathematics teacher’s professional practice. Sisyphus, 1(3), 76-93. Pettersson, K., Stadler, E. y Tambour, T. (2013). Transformation of students’ discourse on the threshold concept of function. En: Ubuz, B., Haser, Ç. y Mariotti, M. A. (eds.). Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 24062415). Middle East Technical Universi-ty and ERME. Philips, N. (2015). Domain, Co-domain and causation: A study of Britney’s conception of function. En: Fukawa-Connelly, T., Infante, N., Keene, K. y Zandieh, M. (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 803895). SIGMAA on RUME Vargas, J. (2017). Análisis de la práctica del docente universitario de precálculo. Estudio de casos en la en-señanza de las funciones exponenciales. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. Vargas, J., Vargas, N. y González, M. T. (2020). Una modelación de mecanismos de construcción y las pro-piedades los logaritmos. En: Quintana, M. (ed.). Diario de Campo. Resultados del desarrollo de métodos y técnicas de investigación, 10 (pp. 252-276). Sello Editorial Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Vidakovic, D. (1996) Learning the concept of inverse function. Journal for Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15(3), 295-318. Vidakovic, D. (1997). Learning the concept of inverse function in a group versus individual environment. En: Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. y Reynolds, B. E. (eds.). Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics (vol. 44, 175-196). The Mathematical Association of America. Weber, C. (2016). Making logarithms accessible operational and structural basic models for logarithms. Journal für MathematikDidaktik, 37(supl. 1), 69-98. Weber, C. (2017). Graphing logarithmic functions: Multiple interpretations of logarithms as a basis for understanding. En: Douley, T. y Gueudet, G. (eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Soci-ety for Research in Mathematics Education CERME10 (pp. 537544). DCU Institute of Education y ERME. Wilson, F., Adamson, S., Cox, T. y O’Brian, A. (2011) Inverse functions: What our teachers didn’t tell us. Mathematics Teacher, 104(7), 500-507.