Racionalidad del formador de profesores de matemáticas subyacente en el diseño de tareas sobre argumentación

Referencias

Battista, M. y Clements, D. (2000). Mathematics curriculum development as a scientific endeavor. En A. Kelly y R. Lesh (Eds.), Education, Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science (pp. 737-760). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. y Tanguay, D. (2012). Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom. En G. Hanna y M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (pp. 349-368). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_20 Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. y Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1-2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0004-1 Herbst, P. y Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: studying the justification of actions in mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 405-462. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551- 3440.1225 Hernández, H. y Parra, R. (2013). Problemas sobre la distinción entre razonamientos deductivos e inductivos y su enseñanza. Innovación Educativa, 13(63), 61-73. Knipping, C. y Reid, D. (2019). Argumentation analysis for early career researchers. En G. Kaiser y N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs (pp. 3-31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_1 Ledezma, C., Sol, T., Sala-Sebastià, G. y Font, V. (2022). Knowledge and beliefs on mathematical modelling inferred in the argumentation of a prospective teacher when reflecting on the incorporation of this process in his lessons. Mathematics, 10, Artículo 3339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ math10183339 Metaxas, N., Potari, D. y Zachariades, T. (2016). Analysis of a teacher’s pedagogical arguments using Toulmin’s model and argumentation schemes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9701-z Molina, O. y Samper, C. (2019). Tipos de problemas que provocan la generación de argumentos inductivos, abductivos y deductivos. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 32(62), 109-134. Nardi, E., Biza, I. y Zachariades, T. (2012). ‘Warrant’ revisited: Integrating mathematics teachers’ pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin’s model for argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 79, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9345-y Sierpinska, A. (2004). Research in mathematics education through a keyhole: Task problematization. For the learning of mathematics, 24(2), 7-15. Sol, T., Sánchez, A., Breda, A., Font, V. y Hummes, V. (2022). Análisis de la reflexión de futuros profesores de matemáticas sobre los errores que cometen en su práctica docente. En T. F. Blanco, C. Núñez-García, M. C. Cañadas y J. A. González-Calero (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXV (pp. 549- 557). SEIEM Sousa, J., Silva, T., Font, V. y Cassia, J. (2020). Task (re)design to enhance the didacticmathematical knowledge of teachers. Revista de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática, 2(4), 98-120. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5711 Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3ª ed., pp. 443–466). Sage. Toulmin, S. (2007). Los usos de la argumentación. (Trads. M. Morrás y V. Pineda). Ediciones Península. Leal, F. (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. Editorial Universitaria. Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. En B. Jaworski y T. Wood (Eds.), The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional (Vol. 4, pp. 93–114). Sense Publishers.