Unpacking interactions using Brousseau’s didactical milieu
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Manouchehri, Azita
Resumen
In this work we used Brousseau’s Theory of Didactical Situation to examine ways in which interactions with a researcher/teacher influenced athematical practices of a child. The findings suggest an extension of teaching actions associated with TDS to include the process of stabilizing mathematical understanding of children as they interact with and engage in taskmilieu.
Fecha
2014
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Comprensión | Gestión de aula | Reflexión sobre la enseñanza | Tareas
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
4
Número
1
Rango páginas (artículo)
17-41
ISSN
22380345
Referencias
Arsac, G., Balacheff, N., & Mante, M. (1992). Teacher’s role and reproducibility of didactic situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(1), 5–29. Arzarello, F, Bosch, M., Gascon, J. & Sabena, C. (2008). The ostensive dimension through the lenses of two didactic approaches. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 179-188. Balacheff, N. (1991). Treatment of refutations: Aspects of the complexity of a constructivist approach of mathematics learning. In von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education (pp. 89-110). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Bloome, D., Beierle, M., Grigorenko, M., & Goldman, S. (2009). Learning over time: uses of intercontextuality, collective memories, and classroom chronotopes in the construction of learning opportunities in a ninth-grade language arts classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 313-334. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer: Dordrecht. Brousseau, G., & Balacheff, N. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970-1990. M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer academic publishers. Brousseau, G. (2003). Glossaire de quelques concepts de la théorie des situations didactiques en mathémat iques. Retrieved on November 4, from http://dipmat.math.unipa.it/~grim/Gloss_fr_Brousseau.pdf Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94. Cobb, Paul (1988). The Tension between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 87-103. Cobb, Paul, Boufi, Ada, McClain, Kay, Whitenack, Joy (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 (3), 258–277. Goldin, G. (1997). Observing Mathematical Problem Solving through Task-Based Interviews. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph (Vol 9)- Qualitative Research Methods in Mathematics Education, 40-62&164-177. Goldin, G. A. (1992). Meta-analysis of problem-solving studies: A critical response. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 274-283. Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In Kelly, A. E. & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (517-546). Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Kahveci, M., & Imamoglu, Y. (2007). Interactive learning in mathematics education: Review of recent literature. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 137-153. Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2009). Discourse-Enriched Instruction in the Mathematics Classroom: Analyzing Collective-Problem Solving. In K. Kumpulainen and C. Hmelo-Silver’s (Eds.) Investigating Classroom Interaction: Methodologies in Action, pp. 43-72. Macbeth, D. (2000). Classrooms as installations. In S. Hestor & J. Hughes (Eds.), The local education order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Mason, J. (1999). Learning and doing mathematics (2nd edition). York, United Kingdom: QED. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. Radford, L. (2008) Connecting theories in mathematics education: challenges and possibilities.ZDM -The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 317-327. Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM: International Journal in Mathematics Education, 40, 83-96. Radford, L., Boero, P. & Vasco, C. (2000). Epistemological assumptions framing interpretations of students understanding of mathematics, Fauvel, J. & van Maanen, J. (Eds.), History in Mathematics Education, 162-167, Kluwer, Dordrecht. Radford, L. (2002). The seen the spoken and the written: a semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14-23. Steffe, L. (2013). Research Commentary: Establishing Mathematics Education as an Academic Field: A Constructive Odyssey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 353- 371. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction.American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.