Una experiencia en el aula, en la básica secundaria: conceptualización del Kuid

Referencias

[1] Arnal, J. et al. (1992). Investigaci´on Educativa. Fundamentos y Metodolog ´ıa, Barcelona: Labor. [2] Bartolini, M; BOERO, P (1998).Teaching and Learning Geometry in Context. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [3] Battista, M. y Clements, D. (1995). Geometry and Proof, The Mathematics Teacher. Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 48 - 53. [4] Ben Chaim, D et al (1989).The role of Visualization in the Middle School Mathematics Curriculum. En HITT F (1998). Visualizaci´on matem´atica, representaciones, nuevas tecnolog´ıas y curr´ıculo., Revista Educaci´on Matem´atica. Vol. 10, no. 1, abril. [5] Bishop (1980). ¿Cu´ales son algunos obst´aculos para el aprendizaje de la geometr´ıa? . Revista Estudios en Educaci´on Matem´atica: Ense˜nanza de la Geometr´ıa. Ed. Morris Robert, vol. 5. Unesco pp. 183 - 208 [6] Brousseau G (1986). Th´eorisation des ph´enom`enes d’enseignement des math´ematiques. Th`ese d’´etat, Universit´e de Bourdeaux 1. [7] Brumfield (1973) Conventional approaches using synthetic Euclidean geometry,En Henderson (eds) Geometry in the mathematics curriculum, Yearbook, Reston VA, NCTM, pp 95 - 115. [8] Burger, W. y Shaughnessy, M. (1986). Characterizing the Van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 31 - 48. [9] Camargo, L. y Samper, C. (1999). Desarrollo del razonamiento Deductivo a trav´es de la Geometr´ıa Euclidiana. Tea: Tecne, Episteme y Didaxis. Universidad Pedag´ogica Nacional, Bogot´a, No 5. [10] Clemens, S et al (1989). Geometr´ıa con aplicaciones y soluci´on de problemas. Addison Wesley Iberoam´erica. S. A. [11] Clements, D. y Battista, M. (1992). Geometry and Spatial Reasoning. En Grouws, Douglas (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics teaching and Learning: a Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. NCTM, New York. [12] Crowley, M. (1987). The Van Hiele Model of the development of geometric thought. En NCTM Learning and Teaching Geometry K-12, 1987 Yearbook. Reston. [13] DE Guzman, M (1996). El rinc´on de la pizarra, En Placencia I et al (1998). Visualizaci´on y creatividad. En Revista Educaci´on Matem´atica. Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 102 - 120. [14] Duval, R (1998). Geometry from a cognitive point of view, En Mammana C; Villani I V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [15] Duval R (1999). Semiosis y Pensamiento Humano. Registros semi´oticos y aprendizajes intelectuales. Universidad del Valle; Instituto de Educaci ´on y Pedagog´ıa. [16] Ernst P (1994). Constructivism - Which form provides the most adequate theory of mathematics learning?. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [17] Farrell, M (1987). Geometry for Secondary School Teachers. En NCTM, Yearbook; Learning and teaching geometry, k -12; Reston Virginia, p 236- 250. [18] Gardner (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books. [19] Glaeser, G (1986). La Didactique experim´entale des math´ematiques. 2o partie: La conception g´enetiqu´e. Universit´e Louis Pasteur, IREM, Strasbourg. [20] Gravemeijer, K (1998). About Reasoning in Geometry. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [21] Greeno (1980). Some examples of Cognitive task analysis with instructional implications. En: Snow et al. (eds). Aptitude, learning and instruction, Vol 2, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. [22] Gutierrez, A. Y Jaime, A. (1989). Bibliograf´ıa sobre el modelo de razonamiento geom´etrico de Van Hiele. Revista Ense˜nanza de las Ciencias, 7(1), 89-95. [23] Hadamard, J (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. En Placencia I et al (1998). Visualizaci´on y creatividad. En Revista Educaci´on Matem´atica. Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 102 - 120. [24] Hershkowitz, Vinner y Bruckeimer. (1987). Activities with Teachers Based on cognitive research. En NCTM, Yearbook; Learning and teaching geometry, k -12; Reston Virginia, p 222 - 236. [25] Hershkowitz, R (1989). Visualizaci´on en Geometr´ıa. Revista: Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11, pp 61 - 76. [26] Hershkowitz, R (1998). About Reasoning in Geometry. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [27] Hoffer, A. (1990). La Geometr´ıa es m´as que demostraci´on. En: Notas de Matem´atica. No 29, Abril. pp. 10 - 24. [28] Jaime, A.; Chapa, F. y Gutierrez, A. (1992). Definiciones de Tri´angulos y Cuadril´ateros: Errores e Inconsistencias en Libros de Texto de E. G. B. Epsilon No 23, Madrid. pp. 49 - 62. [29] Jaime, A. y Gutierrez, A. (1992). Una Propuesta de Fundamentaci´on para la Ense˜nanza de la Geometr´ıa: El Modelo de Van Hiele. En: Teor´ıa y Pr´actica en Educaci´on Matem´atica. Editores Llinares, S. y S´anchez, M. V. Sevilla, pp. 295 - 389. [30] Mayberry, J. (1983). The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought in Undergraduate Preservice Teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 58 - 69. [31] NCTM (1991). Est´andares curriculares y de evaluaci´on para la Educaci ´on Matem´atica. Sociedad Andaluza de Educaci´on Matem´atica, Madrid. [32] Piaget e Inhelder (1967). The Child’s conception of space. New York: W.W. Norton y Co. [33] Placencia, I. et al (1998). Visualizaci´on y creatividad. En Revista Educaci ´on Matem´atica. Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 102 - 120. [34] Romero, I. (1997). La introducci´on del n´umero real en la ense˜nanza secundaria: Una experiencia de investigaci´on-acci´on. Editorial Comares con la colaboraci´on del Departamento de Did´actica de la Matem´atica de la Universidad de Granada. [35] Samper C; Camargo L; Leguizamon C. (2001). Razonamiento en Geometr ´ıa. Revista EMA, Investigaci´on e innovaci´on en Educaci´on Matem ´atica. Volumen 6, No2, marzo de 2001. [36] Senk, S. (1989). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Writing Geometry Proofs.; Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol 20, No. 3, pp. 309 - 321 [37] Schoenfeld (1986). On having and using geometric knowledge. En Hiebert (ed) Conceptual and procedural knowledge, The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [38] Serra, M. (1998). Discovering Geometry: an inductive approach. Key Curriculum Press; San Francisco. [39] Tymocko (1986). New directions in the philosophy of mathematics. Birkh¨auser. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. [40] Usinkin (1982). Van Hiele leveles and achievement in secondary school geometry. Final Report of the Cognitive Development and Achievement in secondary School Geometry Projet. Chicago University, Department of Education.. [41] Van Hiele (1959). La pense´e de l’enfant et la g´eometrie. Bulletin de l’APMEP, No. 198, pp 199 - 205. [42] Van Hiele (1984). The Didactics og Geometry in the lowest class of secondary school. En Fuys et al. (eds) English translation of selected writings of DINA van Hield - Geldof and Pierre van Hiele. Brooklyn NY: Brooklyn College, School of Education. [43] Van Hiele (1986). Structura and Insight. Orlando: Academic Press. [44] Vergnaud G (1997). The Nature of Mathematical Concepts. En NUNES T et al (1997) Learning and Teaching Mathematics: An International Perspectives, Psychology Press. [45] Von Glaserfeld (1988). Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education. En HERSHKOWITZ, R (1998). About Reasoning in Geometry. En Mammana C; Villani V (eds). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands