Maintaining standards: a foucauldian historical analysis of the NCTM standards movement

Referencias

Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy. and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431. Bullock, E. C. (2012). Conducting “good” equity research in mathematics education: A question of methodology. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 3(2), 30–36. Bullock, E. C. (2013). An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards Documents (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/msit_diss/110/ Codd, J. A. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235–247. Cotton, T. (2004). What can I say, and what can I do? Archaeology, narrative and assessment. In M. Walshaw, Mathematics Education within the Postmodern (pp. 219–237). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan Smith). New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon, Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1983). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 229–252). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow, The Foucault Reader (pp. 76–100). New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction. (R. Hurley). New York: Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan). New York: Vintage Books. Fox, N. J. (1998). Foucault, Foucauldians and sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 415–433. Gates, J. D. (2003). Perspective on the recent history of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. In G. M. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick, A history of school mathematics (pp. 737–752). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. Hook, D. (2005). Genealogy, discourse, “effective history”: Foucault and the work of critique. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 3–31. Johnson, D. C., Romberg, T. A., & Scandura, J. M. (1994). The origins of the JRME: A retrospective account. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 560–582. Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. Introducing qualitative methods. London: Sage. Langrall, C. W., Martin, T. S., Ellerton, N. F., Hertel, J. T., & Fain, A. L. (2013). JRME—A stage for scholarly discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 338–339. Lindquist, M. M. (2003). My perspective on the NCTM Standards. In G. M. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick, A history of school mathematics (pp. 819–842). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. McLeod, D. B. (2003). From consensus to controversy: The story of the NCTM Standards. In G. M. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick, A history of school mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 753–818). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. McLeod, D. B., Stake, R. E., Schappelle, B. P., Mellissinos, M., & Gierl, M. J. (1996). Setting the standards: NCTM’s role in the reform of mathematics education. In S. A. Raizen & E. D. Britton, Bold Ventures: Case Studies of U.S. Innovations in Mathematics Education (pp. 13–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Olson, M., & Berk, D. (2001). Two mathematicians’ perspectives on standards: Interviews with Judith Roitman and Alfred Manaster. School Science and Mathematics, 101(6), 305–309. Parks, A. N. (2009). Doomsday device: Rethinking the deployment of the “achievement gap” in equity arguments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(1), 14–19. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Romberg, T. A. (1998). Comments: NCTM’s curriculum and evaluation standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 8–21. Seymour, D., & Davidson, P. S. (2003). A history of nontextbook materials. In G. M. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick, A history of school mathematics (pp. 989–1035). Reston, VA: NCTM. St Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515. Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2012). Critical postmodern theory in mathematics education research: A praxis of uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 41–55. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. New York, NY: Routledge. Walls, F. (2009). Of archaeology and genealogy: Choosing sites and tools. In Mathematical Subjects: Children Talk about their Mathematical Lives (pp. 13–25). London: Springer. Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.