Morality and news media representations of mathematics education

Referencias

Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Appelbaum, P. (2014). Nomadic ethics and regimes of truth. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(3), 16-18. Camara, W. J., & Shaw, E. J. (2012). The media and educational testing: In pursuit of the truth or in pursuit of a good story? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(2), 33-37. Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London, UK: Sage. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619-634. Foucault, M. (1979/2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979 (ed. Senellart, M., trans. Burchell, G.). New York, NY: Picador. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD’s PISA study on the German education system. In H. Ertl (Ed.) Cross-national attraction in education: Accounts from England and Germany, pp. 195–208. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books. Kee, C. P., Ibrahim, F., Ahmad, F., & Khiang, C. C. (2012). Frame contention between news sources and news media: Framing the dispute of teaching Mathematics and Science in English. Asian Social Science, 8(5), p16. Lange, T. & Meaney, T. (2014). It’s just as well kids don’t vote: The positioning of children through public discourse around national testing. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 377–397. Matthes, J. (2007, May). Looking back while moving forward. Paper presented at conference Creating Communication: Content, Control, Critique, San Francisco. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do (Volume I). Paris, France: OECD. OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do (Volume I, revised edition). Paris, France: OECD. Pons, X. (2012). Going beyond the ‘PISA shock’ discourse: An analysis of the cognitive reception of PISA in six European countries, 2001–2008. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 206–226. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion, pp. 173–212. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Scheufele, D., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of communication, 57(1), 9-20. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50(2), 93-109. Waldow, F. (2009). Review essay: What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the ‘PISA-shock’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 476-483. Walkerdine, V. (1987). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London, UK: Routledge.