Positioning of the teacher in the improvement of mathematics classroom practice
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Bergsten, Christer y Jablonka, Eva.
Resumen
This paper is a hybrid between a discussion essay and a theoretical paper. Our concern is the positioning of teachers in contexts where the reshaping of educational institutions along with the commercialisation and commodification of research carried out at universities, increasingly interferes with the intellectual freedom of both teachers and researchers. Funding of research in these contexts privileges ‘findings’ with direct implications for developing teachers’ classroom work. We discuss examples drawn from a range of studies, including classroom observation, curriculum design, and professional development settings in terms of the subjectivities attributed to the unauthorised position in the relations established in these practices.
Fecha
2015
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Acceso y permanencia | Colaboración entre colegas | Desarrollo del profesor | Gestión de aula | Reflexión sobre la enseñanza
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Usuario
Título libro actas
Proceedings of the eighth international mathematics education and society conference (volumen 3)
Editores (actas)
Lista de editores (actas)
Greer, Brian y Mukhopadhyay, Swapna
Editorial (actas)
Lugar (actas)
Rango páginas (actas)
644 - 656
Referencias
Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127-166. Dowling, P. (2009). Sociology as method: Departures form the forensics of culture, text and knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Gellert, U., Becerra Hernández, R., & Chapman, O. (2013). Research methods in mathematics teacher education. In M. A. Clements et al. (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327-360). New York, NY: Springer. Hatch, G., & Shiu, C. (1998). Practitioner research and the construction of knowledge in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. An ICMI Study (pp. 297-315). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (Eds.). (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., Blazar, D., McGinn, D., Kraft, M. A., Beisiegel, M., … Lynch, K. (2012). Validating arguments for observational instruments: Attending to multiple sources of variation. Educational Assessment, 17, 1-19. Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794-831. Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 42-61. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Linking research to practice: Teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research. In M. A. Clements et al. (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 361-392). New York, NY: Springer. Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project (2011). Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 25–47. Lerman, S. (2014). Mapping the effects of policy on mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 187-201. Morgan, C. (2013). Reflections on evaluation and values in mathematics education practices: A response to Zain Davis. In M. Berger, K. Brodie, V. Frith, & K. le Roux (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Mathematics Education Conference (pp. 60-64). Cape Town, South Africa. Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Radder, H. (2010). The commodification of academic research. In H. Radder (Ed.), The commodification of academic research. Science and the modern university (pp. 1-23). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Rice, J. M. (1893). The public-school system of the United States. New York, NY: Century. Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50-60. Runesson, U., & Kullberg, A. (2010). Learning from variation: Differences in learners’ ways of experiencing differences. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. Dahl Söndergaard, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook of Nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 299-317). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Wei, H., Hembry, T., Murphy, D., & McBride, Y. (2012). Value-added models in the evaluation of teacher effectiveness: A comparison of models and outcomes. Research Report, Pearson Education. Retrieved form: http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research White, A. L., Jaworski, B., Agudelo-Valderrama, C., & Gooya, Z. (2013). Teachers learning from teachers. In M. A. Clements et al. (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 393-431). New York, NY: Springer.