Supporting students with learning disabilities to explore linear relationships using online learning objects

Referencias

Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Horney, M. A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 461- 484. Bardini, C., & Stacey, K. (2006). Students’ conceptions of m and c: How to tune a linear function. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 113-120). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University. Beatty, R. (2007). Young students’ understanding of linear functions: Using ge- ometric growing patterns to mediate the link between symbolic notation and graphs. In T. Lamberg (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Lake Tahoe, NV: University of Nevada. Beatty, R., & Bruce, C. (2008, July). Assessing a research/pd model in pattern- ing and algebra. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Math- ematical Education. Monterrey, Mexico. Bloch, I. (2003). Teaching functions in a graphic milieu: What forms of knowledge enable students to conjecture and prove? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 3-28. Brassel, H. M., & Rowe, M. B. (1993). Graphing skills among high school phys- ics students. School Science and Mathematics, 93(2), 63-71. Cawley, J. F., & Parmar, R. S. (1992). Arithmetic programming for students with disabilities: an alternative. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 6-18. Evan, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105-121. Foegen, A. (2008). Algebra progress monitoring and interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31(1), 65-78. Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493-513. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 43-52. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. N. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 13-24. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31(1), 79-92. Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 345-362. Geary, D. C. (2007). An evolutionary perspective on learning disability in math- ematics. Developmental Neurophysiology, 32(1), 471-519. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and inter- ventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Dis- abilities, 38(4), 293-304. Green, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38(1), 25-33. Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on the effects of mas- tery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leader- ship, 33(8), 73-80. Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s powers to produce algebraic think- ing. In J. Kaput, D., Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 57-94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004). Designing and Using Mathematical Tasks. London, United Kingdom: Tarquin Books. Montague, M. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 75-83. Moschkovich, J. (1996). Moving up and getting steeper: Negotiating shared de- scriptions of linear graphs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 239- 277. Moschkovich, J. (1998). Resources for refining conceptions: case studies in the domain of linear functions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 209- 237. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Students’ use of the x-intercept as an instance of a tran- sitional conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 169-197. Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: on multiple perspectives and representations of linear relations, and connec- tions among them. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), In- tegrating research on the graphical representation of function (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. Ostad, S. A. (1997). Developmental differences in addition strategies: a compari- son of mathematically disables and mathematically normal children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 345-357. Pedrotty-Bryant, D. (2005). Commentary on early identification and interven- tions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabili- ties, 38(4), 340-345. Rico, L. (2009). Sobre las nociones de representación y comprensión en la inves- tigación en Educación Matemática. PNA, 4(1), 1-14. Shalev, R., Auerbach, O. M., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2000). Developmental dyscal- culia: prevalence and prognosis. European Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(Supplement 2), 58-64. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematical Teaching, 77(3), 20-26. Skemp, R. (1979). Intelligence, learning, and action: a foundation for theory and practice in education. New York, NY: Wiley. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1999). Definition x treatment interactions for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 28(4), 644- 658. Yerushalmy, M. (1991). Students perceptions of aspects of algebraic function us- ing multiple representation software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(1), 42-57.