Geometría dinámica: desde otro ángulo la geometría del ángulo

Referencias

[1] Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D. y Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments. ZDM, 43(3), 66-72. [2] Camargo, L., Samper, C. y Perry, P. (2006). Una visi´on de la actividad demostrativa en geometr´ıa plana para la educaci´on matem´atica con el uso de programas de geometr´ıa din´amica. Lecturas Matem´aticas, Volumen Especial, pp. 371-383. Ponencia presentada en XV Congreso Nacional de Matem´aticas, 8-12 de agosto de 2005, Bogot´a, Sociedad Colombiana de Matem´aticas. [En l´ınea, fecha de consulta: 10 de febrero de 2008. Disponible en: www.scm.org.co/Articulos/853.pdf] [3] Camargo, L., Samper, C. y Perry, P. (2007). Cabri’s role in the task of proving within the activity of building part of an axiomatic system. Ponencia presentada en CERME 5, en el grupo de trabajo sobre la demostraci´on. [En l´ınea, fecha de consulta: 10 de febrero de 2008. Disponible en: www.lettredelapreuve.it/CERME5Papers/WG4-Camargo.pdf] [4] de Villiers, M. (2004). Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers’ understanding of proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(5), 703-724. [5] Forman, E.A. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. En L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin y B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115-130). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. [6] Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 4, 258-291. [7] Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 177-211. [8] Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R. y Schwarz, B. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 127-150. [9] Healy, L. y Hoyles, C. (2001). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: potencials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computer for Mathematical Learning, 6, 235-256. [10] Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students’ interpretation when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 55-85. [11] Laborde, C. (2000). Dynamic geometry environments as a source of rich learning contexts for the complex activity of proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 151-161. [12] Mariotti, M.A. (2000). Introduction to proof: the mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 25-53. [13] Marrades, R. y Guti´errez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 87-125. [14] Martin, T., McCrone, S., Bower, M. y Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(1), 95-124. [15] Perry, P., Camargo, L., Samper, C. y Rojas, C. (2006). Actividad demostrativa en la formaci ´on inicial del profesor de matem´aticas. Bogot´a: Fondo editorial de la Universidad Pedag´ogica Nacional. [16] Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de pr´actica. Aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona: Paid´os.